Search Results

1. BS & WQ v K Ltd & ors [2023] NZDT 653 (2 November 2023) [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...suggestion made by K Ltd. I further take into account the [Lawn Services Company] pricing was for the complete grounds that K Ltd relied on were from 2021. I expect the cost for the area to be remedied would have increased from 2021 and without updated information am satisfied that the price for the complete lawn might be sufficient to cover the partial lawn that needs remedying. Therefore, I find that BS and WQ are entitled to claim $8,000.00 from K Ltd and T Ltd and the remainder of the...

2. ES v M Ltd [2023] NZDT 218 (3 May 2023) [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...remains at the premises of [mechanic company]. As this order now vests ownership of the car in M Ltd, M Ltd may collect it and deal with it as it wishes. Referee: C Hawes Date: 3 May 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

3. ST & CT v OU [2021] NZDT 1606 (21 June 2021) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...and place. Did OU meet its duty of care by maintaining this section of road within the tolerances of its roading maintenance contract with GI? 17. The roading maintenance contract stipulates maximum tolerances for various types of road deformations / defects (shunts, heaves, potholes, etc). 18. The contract also obliges GI to carry out road inspections. 19. Mr L explained that GI carries out an annual ‘road truck test’ in addition to more frequent visual inspections.

4. HN v UC & JS Ltd [2023] NZDT 166 (6 June 2023) [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...entrance of the workshop that stated JS Limited. UC said he would urgently provide a photo of that sign, but none was received during the adjournment period. 8. In order for a business to get the benefit of its limited liability status it must inform parties that it is entering into a contract with a limited liability company. On the facts of this case, I find that it was not brought to HN’s attention that he was entering into a contract with a company and not with UC personally....

5. EQ v MT Ltd [2022] NZDT 45 (16 May 2022) [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...observed that some of the truck loads of fill delivered were not clean fill but were contaminated with building materials. He discussed this with TG, from MT Ltd, and was initially assured that this would be remedied. However, on 22 December 2022 TG informed him that MT Ltd was removing its equipment, and would not complete the job, remove the contaminated fill, or remedy other damage done to the property. 2. EQ claims the sum of $30,000.00 for the cost of remedial work, and completion...

6. BD Ltd v QC Inc [2022] NZDT 162 (10 October 2022) [pdf, 132 KB]

   ...boxes in the building to the letterbox of the newly appointed Commodore, UM. 5. BD Ltd’s invoice to QC Inc for the Manager’s fee and catering services amounting to a total of $662.50 was not paid, on the basis that BB had failed to provide information and services required by QC Inc and, as a result QC Inc has incurred cost and spent time resolving matters. Since lodging this Tribunal claim, QC Inc has paid $162.50 for catering services. BD Ltd seeks payment of the $500 monthly fe...

7. B Ltd v UE & SE [2023] NZDT 517 (2 October 2023) [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...evidential standard I find there is insufficient evidence of a nominal gain for the respondents from the process. 15. Accordingly, the claim is dismissed. Referee: DTR Goddard Date: 2 October 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

8. KI & QI v TX [2021] NZDT 1688 (10 December 2021) [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...have jurisdiction to hear the claim. 29. For these reasons, I find that the claim is proved and TX is to pay KI & QI $200.00. Referee: K Johnson Date: 10 December 2021 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

9. SC v NI [2017] NZDT 1675 (11 December 2017) [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...Insurance Company B. [13] Once the amounts payable by each of SC and NI are netted off, I find SC is liable to pay $3,499.00 to Insurance Company B. Referee: Peter Ferguson Date: 11 December 2017 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available or a mistake was made. If you wish...

10. LB & SH v BB and others [2023] NZDT 7 (2 March 2023) [pdf, 114 KB]

    ...jetski. The balance of the [Finance Company] debt would be recovered by [Finance Company] from BB. BB agreed to this arrangement. 9. Although finance was in his name, BB has disputed he was the owner of the jetski. BB stated in evidence that his former partner, TB, wanted the jetski, however as he had a better credit rating, it was put in his name. BB and TB separated in April 2021 and therefore decided to sell the jetski. 10. TB stated in evidence that the jetski belonged to both he...