Search Results

1. NC v VU Ltd [2023] NZDT 546 (12 October 2023) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...satisfactory lease ever being agreed. [17] On that basis I am persuaded NC is entitled to a full refund of the deposit paid. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 Referee: Hannan DTR Date: 12 October 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

2. BL v SI [2024] NZDT 309 (4 April 2024) [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...been made by a member of the public to MAF about the state of animals that BL was feeding for her parents. It appears that there may also have been a complaint about some of the animals SI was responsible for, although I do not have any further information about the nature, extent, or outcome of any of these complaints. 17. SI also said that although he had asked for BL to provide timesheets of the hours she had worked, she failed to do so. When BL provided evidence from the notes s...

3. DB v K Ltd [2024] NZDT 325 (16 April 2024) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...outside of jurisdiction or unnecessarily prolonged proceedings. As none of these exceptions apply in this case the applicant’s claim for costs is dismissed. Referee: Hannan DTR Date: 16 April 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

4. D Ltd v O Ltd [2024] NZDT 321 (18 April 2024) [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...free to file its own application seeking reimbursement for payments made to the applicant under invoices 173587, 175616, 176752 and 17675 in the Tribunal. Referee: Hannan DTR Date: 18 April 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

5. D Ltd v KG [2024] NZDT 323 (15 May 2024) [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...in his fibreglass over ply boat and asked for a quote from the applicant to remedy. The applicant advised that it appeared the boat had suffered some impact damage and estimated $2,000 to repair the leak. [3] The applicant advised respondent to inform his insurer and he did so. The insurer, J Ltd, agreed to cover the repair.1 The respondent completed the repair and invoiced the applicant $2,346.00. This amount was paid by the respondent to the applicant. The respondent was later reimburse...

6. BN v D Ltd [2024] NZDT 292 (26 April 2024) [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...prior to purchasing [the horse], BN himself an experienced and established horseman within the equestrian industry, inspected and rode [the horse]. BN acknowledged from the trial ride that [the horse] was sound at the time and under BN’s hand performed what BN sought from him. BN turned down, against D Ltd’s recommendation, the getting of a veterinarian pre-purchase check. b. Furthermore, BN commented that prior to becoming lame, [the horse] had improved with his riding during this...

7. KC & LC v BD [2024] NZDT 335 (16 May 2024) [pdf, 140 KB]

   ...rent, or to the storage fees they incurred when the decided to move out on 27 December. 16. For these reasons I find that BD is liable to pay LC and KC $350.00. Referee: L Trevelyan Date: 16 May 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

8. NG v CG [2024] NZDT 343 (26 April 2024) [pdf, 145 KB]

   ...• The sum of $30 monthly commencing on or before 20 May 2024 and continuing until fully paid. • If any payment is missed the balance owed at the time of default becomes due immediately. • J Ltd will contact CG and provide all necessary information so a payment plan can be set up. Reasons: 1. NG was stationary at a Give Way on [Road 1]’s intersection with [Road 2]. CG was driving on [Road 2] intending to turn right into [Road 1]. 2. CG’s car impacted NG’s car as CG

9. HT v Q Ltd [2024] NZDT 337 (7 May 2024) [pdf, 133 KB]

   ...photo of HT from his phone to use for the real time ID process, and then tried to log in to his account. HT says he should not have been terminated by VX because he was not involved in this fraud. 12. Q Ltd says it took into account all of the information submitted by HT, and made multiple reviews of its original decision to terminate the account when requested by HT. It says however that each time it reviewed the matter the original decision to terminate HT’s account was confirmed....

10. TN v T Ltd & X Ltd [2024] NZDT 340 (24 April 2024) [pdf, 96 KB]

    ...and conditions and I do not consider that a breach of contract has been able to be proved in this case. For these reasons the claim must be dismissed. 12. I note that in any event TN has now received back his old phone, and can sell it on a platform such as [website]. He may well be able to realise there the amount that he has suggested the phone is worth, and so even if there had been a breach of contract by T Ltd or X Ltd, it is questionable whether any loss could have been proved....