Search Results

1. 2020-10-27-Eckhoff-Gerrard-Mortland.pdf [pdf, 137 KB]

     Advice: If you have any questions about this notice, contact the Environment Court in Christchurch Notice of wish to be party to proceedings S 274, Resource Management Act 1991 If you wish to be a party to the proposed plan change hearing, you must lodge this notice with the Environment Court by MONDAY 16 NOVEMBER 2020.* You can lodge this notice by email or by posting a copy to the Environment Court in Christchurch at: Environment Court, PO Box 2069, Christchurch 8140

2. 2020-10-27-Coal-Creek-Water-Users-Group.pdf [pdf, 121 KB]

   Advice: If you have any questions about this notice, contact the Environment Court in Christchurch Notice of wish to be party to proceedings S 274, Resource Management Act 1991 If you wish to be a party to the proposed plan change hearing, you must lodge this notice with the Environment Court by MONDAY 16 NOVEMBER 2020.* You can lodge this notice by email or by posting a copy to the Environment Court in Christchurch at: Environment Court, PO Box 2069, Christchurch 8140

3. 2020-11-10-Wise-Response-Society-Inc-PC7.pdf [pdf, 127 KB]

     Advice: If you have any questions about this notice, contact the Environment Court in Christchurch Notice of wish to be party to proceedings S 274, Resource Management Act 1991 If you wish to be a party to the proposed plan change hearing, you must lodge this notice with the Environment Court by MONDAY 16 NOVEMBER 2020.* You can lodge this notice by email or by posting a copy to the Environment Court in Christchurch at: Environment Court, PO Box 2069, Christchurch 8140

4. BU and others v KC [2021] NZDT 1712 (13 December 2021) [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...her into a contract to replace the letterboxes to their former position. Consent for the renovations had already been given, and there was no promise from the applicants given in exchange to KC that was of any value to her. Even if a contract had formed, it would have been based on a common mistake that the letterboxes were not encroaching on KC’s exclusive use, when that was false. If the letterboxes had to be reinstated to that position, then it was subject to the same license which co...

5. [2015] NZEmpC 94 NZ Meat Workers & Related Trades Union Inc v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...first, if not the first, of AFFCO’s to be about to restart after the off-season and to re-engage employees for this purpose. [4] Because the plaintiffs claim that AFFCO has indicated that its offers of employment to union members on its new form of individual employment agreement had to be accepted by the end of yesterday to enable employees to commence work on 22 June 2015, the interlocutory injunction application has been heard urgently and this judgment is being delivered as...

6. TD & LD v GP & Q Ltd [2023] NZDT 377 (28 July 2023) [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...booked with [website] rather than directly through Q Ltd. I am satisfied that TD and LD are entitled to bring a claim against Q Ltd rather than [website]. This is because [website] is Q Ltd’s booking agent and, under the law of agency, a contract formed between Q Ltd and TD and LD when they made the booking through [website]. Was the booking contract frustrated? 6. If the contract between the parties does not contain a provision about what happens if performance is prevented (c...

7. HD v MN [2023] NZDT 491 (20 October 2023) [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...did not sign this amendment. Both parties agreed the draft amended contract only varied the start time for the repayments of $200.00/fortnight but everything else in the loan agreement of 30 August 2021 remained the same. Was the contract performed or breached? 7. HD considered the contract breached by MN as he made his last payment on 29 March 2023 and had not paid anything since. Therefore, he sought full payment of what was owing under the contract. 8. Both parties discussed...

8. MB v PF LCRO 270/2012 (12 December 2016) [pdf, 143 KB]

   ...Appeal dismissed Miss MB’s appeal against conviction. [28] Miss MB had sought to provide the Court of Appeal with more information. That desire echoes one of Miss MB’s concerns over the advice Ms PF provided to LSA: that Ms PF’s view was formed on the basis of insufficient relevant information. Miss MB has not identified what, in particular, she believes would have made the difference to Ms PF’s analysis. [29] As the Court of Appeal intimated, a deluge of irrelevant in...

9. Ruddelle v Auckland District Health Board [2021] NZHRRT 5 [pdf, 230 KB]

   ...2015 Ms Ruddelle complained to the HDC about Dr Bidwell’s conduct. The complaint was ultimately dismissed by the HDC. [5] In October 2015, when reviewing her file to respond to the HDC complaint, Dr Bidwell realised she had not completed the ACC forms for Michael. Prompted by that, Dr Bidwell reviewed Michael’s file and wrote to Dr Kathryn Edward and Dr Bevan who were now treating Michael and completed the ACC form. These actions are collectively the subject of this claim, as in e...

10. BORA SuperGold Health Check Bill [pdf, 206 KB]

    ...Zealand superannuation or veteran's pension. 4.The Bill makes a distinction on the basis of age and marital status. The extent of any disadvantage to those who do not have a SuperGold card would depend on the person’s eligibility for other forms of social welfare, their health, and their socio-economic position. 5.We consider that any discrimination in the Bill is justified under s 5 of the Bill of Rights Act. The primary objective of the Bill is to prevent hospitalisation of ol...