3969 items matching your search terms
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2017] NZHRRT 39 Reference No. HRRT 016/2016 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN FRIEDRICH JOACHIM FEHLING PLAINTIFF AND MINISTRY OF HEALTH DEFENDANT AT HOKITIKA BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms WV Gilchrist, Member Ms ST Scott, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr FJ Fehling in person Ms R Garden for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 20 March 2017 DATE OF SUBSTANTIVE DECISION: 24...
(1) ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF AGGRIEVED PERSON (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF CHAIRPERSON OR OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2013] NZHRRT 40 Reference No. HRRT 008/2013 UNDER SECTION 50 OF THE HEALTH AND DISABILITY COMMISSIONER ACT 1994 BETWEEN DIRECTOR OF PROCEEDINGS PLAINTIFF AND ESTHER MAREE CANDISH DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND...
...negotiated settlement of claims. 6. To the extent the exclusion of subsequent challenge could be said to limit a claimant’s minority rights under s 20 of the Bill of Rights Act, this would be justified on the same basis. 7. The United Nations Human Rights Committee upheld a similar exclusion under the 1992 Fisheries Settlement. The Committee found the exclusion was consistent with articles 14 and 27 of the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights, which are comparable to s...
...above has been breached to the representations of the supplier of the service. The respondent’s advertisement, which the applicant relied on, stated the following: “Does your dog run up/lunge/bark/snarl/dominates or even bites at other dogs or humans and you are afraid to let them interact as your worried they may attack, or they have attacked previously. Or is your dog super anxious and struggles to live a happy life. Then this is the course for you. This programme covers issues such...
...DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 5 August 2024 (REDACTED) DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1 1 This decision is to be cited as Director of Proceedings v Health New Zealand [2024] NZHRRT 37. Note publication restrictions. IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2024] NZHRRT 37 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [1] These proceedings under the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 were filed on 26 March 2024. Prior to the filing of the proceedings the parties reso...
...the safety implications of the proposed marina at Matiatia. I have personally seen dangerous fuel spillages occur despite stringent safety protocols being in place and I have an intimate understaning of the implications of those spills for both human safety and the environment. Those concerns are exacerbated by the particular nature and location of Matiatia. 11. Unlike other marinas located throughout New Zealand, Matiatia is the main port and transport hub for an island comm...
...OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 11 October 2023 (REDACTED) DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1 1 Decision is to be cited as Director of Proceedings v Te Whatu Ora [2023] NZHRRT 32. Note publication restrictions. IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2023] NZHRRT 32 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [1] These proceedings under the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 were filed on 9 November 2022. [2] Prior to the filing of the proceedings the p...
...negotiated settlement of claims. 6. To the extent the exclusion of subsequent challenge could be said to limit a claimant's minority rights under s 20 of the Bill of Rights Act, this would be justified on the same basis. 7. The United Nations Human Rights Committee upheld a similar exclusion under the 1992 Fisheries Settlement. The Committee found the exclusion was consistent with articles 14 and 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which are comparable...
...7.D.5 When considering any discharge under section 12.C, including the duration of any consent, have regard to: (a) The effects, including cumulative effects, of the discharge on water quality, ecosystem health and natural and human use values, including Kāi Tahu cultural and spiritual beliefs, values and uses; and (b) The physical characteristics and any particular sensitivity of the land and the sensitivity of the any receiving water; and (c) The quality and...
...The use of AVL for the appearance of an accused person at trial appears to be uncommon in comparable jurisdictions, at least without the accused person’s consent, and does not appear to have been considered in New Zealand. The European Court of Human Rights has, however, indicated that whether such appearance is consistent with fair trial protections will depend upon the particular circumstances, including the stage of proceedings, possible disadvantage to either party and measures take...