Search Results

1. Williams v Attorney-General [2024] NZHRRT 1 [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...that the Department of Corrections (Corrections) did not respond properly to her request for personal information and so interfered with her privacy. 1 [This decision is to be cited as Williams v Attorney-General [2024] NZHRRT 1.] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2024] NZHRRT 1 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [2] The events which formed the background to Ms Williams’ allegations of breaches of her privacy took place while she was in Auckland Region Women’s Correct...

2. ORC - Felicity Boyd - Evidence in Reply - 11 March 2022 [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...bodies, ecosystem services, and biodiversity • Any adverse effect on water quality, including cumulative effects, and consideration of the trends in the quality of the receiving water body. • Any adverse effect on any natural or human use value, and on use of the coastal marine area for contact recreation and seafood gathering. 20 “Water body” is defined in the RMA as “fresh water or geothermal water in a river, lake, stream, pond, wetland, or aquifer, or a...

3. Proactive release – Government response to the Law Commission Report: “The Second Review of the Evidence Act 2006” [pdf, 2.5 MB]

   ...proceedings. Extension of sections 44 and 44A to civil cases 29. In civil proceedings, there is no general mechanism for controlling the admissibility of sexual experience and sexual reputation evidence, although the Employment Relations Act 2000 and the Human Rights Act 1993 contain specific provisions controlling this evidence in sexual harassment proceedings. 30. However, there may be occasions outside these employment or human rights contexts where it would be appropriate to have...

4. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 DM expert Dennis Scott [pdf, 364 KB]

   ...my evidence I have read the applicant’s AEE, the section 87F report prepared by Auckland Council, ) the evidence of Mr Robert Pryor, Mr Max Dunn, Mr Appledorn, Mr David Mitchell, Buildmedia, Ms Nicole Bremner, Mr Stephen Brown and Mr Sam Shumane. 21. I have also reviewed all of the evidence (expert, local and cultural) to be produced by DMI in support of its case. 22. While I am familiar with the landscape character and land use of Matiatia Bay and its contextual landscap...

5. Gender-Pay-Gap-Action-Plan-2021-website.pdf [pdf, 506 KB]

   ........................................................................................................................ 17 Evidence of outcomes ....................................................................................................... 18 No bias or discrimination in remuneration systems or human resource practices ................. 18 Te Kawa Mataaho milestone ............................................................................................. 18 3 Actions...

6. Proposals against incitement of hatred and discrimination - summary document - Tokelauan [pdf, 298 KB]

   ...te Āmiotonu (Ministry of Justice) (ko te Matāeke) e fia maua mai ni ō lagona ki nā fuafuaga e ono iēia ke hui te tūlāfono e uiga ki te fakaohooho ke fai he āmio kino ma te fakailoga tino. Ko te Tūlāfono o te Aiātatau o Tagata 1993 (Human Rights Act 1993) e fakahā e ia nā lāuga iēia e fakatupu (fakaoho ita ) ai te fakailoga lanu ma te fekehekeheakiga. E fakahā foki e ia te fakailoga tino e teteke ki he tino ona ko te tūlaga e iei ō lātou fakahinomaga. I na kua u...

7. [2014] NZEmpC 153 Roy v BOT of Tamaki College [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...jurisdictional issues to be decided before Christopher Roy’s challenge to a determination 1 of the Employment Relations Authority can progress. [2] Until a few weeks ago the defendant contended that, having chosen to make a complaint under the Human Rights Act 1993, Mr Roy could not subsequently in law bring a personal grievance in reliance on the same conduct by his employer as formed the basis of his Human Rights Act complaint. This argument relied on s 112(4) of the Employ...

8. 2025 NZSSAA 01 [pdf, 338 KB]

   ...Burials and Cremation Act 1964 inform how the term “reasonable funeral expenses” should be understood and interpreted. 43. As noted for Ms XXXX, the difficulty with this proposition is that, despite legislation concerning the disposal of human bodies, the applicable legislative provisions do not refer to disposal of a body, the 9 Burial and Cremation Act, or mandate restrictions based on cultural, social, religious, or other practices chosen by the family. 44. O...

9. BORA Public Health Bill [pdf, 617 KB]

   ...30. The Ministry of Health has advised that the current legislative framework for the protection of public health is outdated. Current trends in international travel; new and emerging threats such as emerging conditions like SARS and new forms of human influenza, but also harm caused by chemical and radionuclear sources; and, changes in international law (in particular, the adoption of the International Health Regulations) all require an updated approach. 31. The Bill, therefore, substan...

10. Taylor v Corrections (No. 2) [2018] NZHRRT 43 [pdf, 323 KB]

    ...DECISION: 27 September 2018 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1 INDEX INTRODUCTION [1] Delay [5] 1 [This decision is to be cited as Taylor v Corrections (No. 2) [2018] NZHRRT 43.] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2018] NZHRRT 43 2 RULING ON ADMISSIBILITY THE CHALLENGE BY MR TAYLOR TO EVIDENCE TENDERED BY CORRECTIONS [9] General principles [11] Evidence in proceedings before the Tribunal [14] The relationship between...