3960 items matching your search terms
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2015] NZHRRT 55 Reference No. HRRT 004/2015 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN LAWRENCE WAYNE DEEMING PLAINTIFF AND WHANGAREI DISTRICT COUNCIL DEFENDANT AT WHANGAREI BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Mr RK Musuku, Member Mr BK Neeson JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr LW Deeming in person supported by Dr CS Anderson as McKenzie friend Mr PJ Magee and Ms KE Candy for defendant...
...support surveillance. The CPTED approach to design There are three approaches to managing the physical environment in ways that will reduce the opportunity for crime: ■ Natural – the integration of security and behavioural concepts into how human and physical resources are designed and used (e.g. border definition, windows). ■ Organised – the introduction of labour-intensive security (e.g. guards, police, security patrols). ■ Mechanical – the introduction of capital...
...effect on 12 April 2019 in compliance with the 28- day rule. Compliance 9. The Regulations comply with the: 9.1. the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi; 9.2. the rights and freedoms contained in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 and the Human Rights Act 1993; 9.3. the principles and guidelines set out in the Privacy Act 1993; 9.4. relevant international standards and obligations; 9.5. Legislation Advisory Committee Guidelines 10. There are no statutory prerequisites re...
...there is a request for an order for further hard copy documents including documents created by, or sent to or by, certain named managers and employees of the defendant. This application also includes relevant documents held by the defendant’s human resources office and human resources files in the defendant’s archives. Included also is the physical material held in the payroll office and the payroll files in the defendant’s archives. [22] These applications are particularl...
...ensuring legal and legislative obligations are met; · proactively managing risks, opportunities for innovation and information to best effect; · monitoring developments in other jurisdictions in relation to electoral matters; · implementing modern human resource policies and practices including Health and Safety; · providing leadership to a wide range of contractors, managers and staff including the up to 25,000 temporary staff who work for the Commission during a general election or an ele...
...credit this to the fact that they have been exposed to so many situations that they (and I) have learned to be brave and accepting of different situations. Getting out and experiencing different sights is vital to building resilience in both horse and human. The social interaction is beneficial for all. 20. The tracks I use are frequented by other road users and in one case, pass through a hillside paddock grazed by up to 7 other horses. The tracks are a variety of surfaces, but mostly...
...within the ambit of s 27(3) of the Bill of Rights Act, which protects procedural rights [4]. 14. To the extent that the rights affirmed by ss 20 and/or 27(2) are limited by the Bill, those limits are justified in terms of s 5. The United Nations Human Rights Committee upheld a similar exclusion under the 1992 fisheries settlement as an incident of a negotiated settlement. The Committee found the exclusion was consistent with the analogous rights under arts 14(1) and 27 of the Internati...
...of the definition is family relationships. Accordingly, the section represents a prima facie infringement of the prohibition on discrimination based on "family status" (as defined in s 21(1)(l)(iv) and s 2(1)("relative") of the Human Rights Act 1993). There is disadvantage involved, in that engaging in consensual sexual activity with person X leaves another person (person Y) open to criminal prosecution if they are a close relative of X, whereas another person (person...
...section 5 of the Bill of Rights Act. Conclusion 22. We have concluded that the Bill appears to be consistent with the Bill of Rights Act. Jeff Orr Chief Legal Counsel Office of Legal Counsel Stuart Beresford Senior Legal Adviser Bill of Rights/Human Rights Team Footnote 1 See Ministry of Transport (MOT) v Noort [1993] 3 NZLR 260; Moonen v Film and Literature Board of Review [2000] 2 NZLR 9; and Moonen v Film and Literature Board of Review [2002] 2 NZLR 754 and Supreme Cour...
...need to obtain assistance rather than continue with the matter himself. [12] We accept the submissions of Mr Young’s counsel, in relation to the speech offending, that, unlike Mr Deliu3, Mr Young did not bring in other institutions such as the Human Rights Commission, the Judicial Conduct Commissioner, rather he made his comments in the course of exercising his appeal rights. Ms Donovan submitted, and we accept, that Mr Young did not attempt to express his views in a manner that...