[2015] NZEmpC 37 Gapuzan v Pratt Whitney Air NZ [pdf, 157 KB]
...be brought before the Tribunal at the date of his bankruptcy, but it cannot be said that that potential created a debt or liability certain or contingent. f) Counsel went on to submit that the principle in Kaye was recently applied by the Human Rights Review Tribunal in Fehling v Appleby 10 when considering s 232 of the IA 2006. There it was held that proceedings before the Tribunal should not be halted by a defendant’s bankruptcy, essentially on similar reasoning as was a...