3943 items matching your search terms
...موقع الویب 2021أغسطس 6یونیو وحتى 25تقدیم المساھمات مفتوح من تاریخ Space على العنوانhttps://consultations.justice.govt.nz أو بالبرید اإللكتروني على العنوان ، humanrights@justice.govt.nz أو بالبرید إلى العنوان ،Human Rights, Ministry of Justice, SX10088, Wellington . یة، یرجى للتعرف على المزید من المعلومات حول عملیة تقدیم المسا...
...very serious emotional impact on [her], personally and the stress has impacted [her] health”. [6] Although this Office lacks the statutory jurisdiction to make determinations in these regards, Ms NR’s views that the decision contravenes the Human Rights Act 1993 and her rights under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, in particular for being expressly and/or impliedly racist, are noted for completeness. [7] Mrs YB’s reply to the application for review is dated 29 July 202...
...means to the Maori people. This superbly presented, colour, poster sized resource has been planned for use with the fourth form social studies syllabus, in particular modules 4.1 (The Treaty of Waitangi) and 4.2 (The search for security, justice and human rights). It can also be used for use in senior school history, geography, legal and cultural studies. Main Themes A Tribal identity and authority /Tino rangatiratanga (cf 'Maori identity') A Tribal ownership of land / Europe...
...fraught with difficulties. These include the difficulties always associated with an attempt to set aside a s 149 Record of Settlement. They also include limitation and jurisdiction issues. For instance, claims are made for remedies under the Human Rights Act 1993 and the Privacy Act 1993; outside the jurisdiction of this Court. There may also be difficulties as to limitation relating to the question of whether personal grievances have been raised in time or raised at all. Furth...
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2016] NZHRRT 28 Reference No. HRRT 035/2015 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN DEBORAH WAXMAN PLAINTIFF AND JITENDRA PAL DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms LJ Alaeinia, Member Mr BK Neeson JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Dr D Waxman in person Dr J Pal in person DATE OF HEARING: 30 and 31 May 2016 DATE OF DECISION: 11 August 2016 DECISION OF TRI...
...notification in the New Zealand Gazette. Compliance 35 The regulatory changes comply with each of the following: 35.1 the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi; 35.2 the rights and freedoms contained in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 or the Human Rights Act 1993; 35.3 the principles and guidelines set out in the Privacy Act 2020; 35.4 relevant international standards and obligations; and 35.5 the Legislation Guidelines (2021 edition), which are maintained by the Leg...
...following approval by the Governor-General. Compliance 47 This Order complies with each of the following: 47.1 the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi; 47.2 the rights and freedoms contained in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 or the Human Rights Act 1993; 47.3 the principles and guidelines set out in the Privacy Act 2020; 47.4 relevant international standards and obligations; I N C O N F I D E N C E 7 I N C O N F I D E N C E 47.5 the Legislation Guidelines (2021...
...described in the claim form is: Running in soft sand on dunes and pulled left foot. [44] In terms of the definitions in the Act the accident in this case was an event that involved the application of force, in this case gravity, external to the human body, that is to say the running in soft sand when he “pulled his left foot”. It is ACR 134/21 Mr Williams’ position that as a result he suffered a personal injury, namely a strain or sprain of his left foot. [45] The oppo...
...Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008. 12 At [18]–[19]. 13 At [24]. 5 (d) Committee failed procedural fairness and natural justice and perverted the course of natural justice. (e) Committee failed procedural of the Human Rights Act. And had based the decision on discrimination and racism. [21] He then repeated, and added to, his complaints: (a) Lawyer failed to act competently. (b) Lawyer failed to act in a timely manner, in accordance with...
...Section 22 – Right not to be arbitrarily detained 46. Section 22 of the Bill of Rights Act affirms that everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily arrested or detained. The purpose of the right not to be arbitrarily detained is the protection of human dignity, autonomy, and liberty.12 47. A person is regarded as detained within the meaning of s 22 if, amongst other things, there are statutory restraints of a person’s movements (accompanied by penalties for non-compliance).13 The e...