Search Results

1. [2017] NZEnvC 150 Blueskin Energy Ltd v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 11 MB]

   ...(objective 16.2.3(g)). Thus, what is to be maintained or enhanced includes the following factors (relevantly):97 32 (a) the general visual dominance of natural elements such as natural landforms, streams and remnant indigenous vegetation over human landscape elements e.g . buildings or shelter plantings; and (b) the generally limited visual influence of any large scale structures or exotic planting to diminish the impact of the natural landscape forms and features . [121] Po...

2. CAC301 v Murphy [2015] NZREADT 42 [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...final analysis report was available on 15 October 2013. Between then and the auction, both defendants must be regarded as responsible for prospective bidders being permitted to inspect the property when it was clearly contaminated and a danger to human health. We do not think that the defendants can be exonerated from having insisted that any such person receive a copy of the analysis report prior to that person deciding to inspect the property and enter it. [96] Nevertheless, we do...

3. [2023] NZEnvC 280 Titirangi Protection Group Incorporated v Auckland Council [pdf, 3 MB]

   ...Auckland Council issued a decision granting regional resource consents under the Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in Part (AUP) and a land use consent under the National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health (NES Soil) to Watercare Services Limited. [2] The regional resource consents and land use consent relate to the earthworks, vegetation removal and associated activities required to establish the Huia Replacement Water Tr...

4. OX v XX Standards Committee LCRO 180/2015 (4 October 2016) [pdf, 456 KB]

   ...5 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, s 4. 6 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, r 5. 7 Rule 5.4. 8 Rule 5.4.1. 18 he could be wrong, but he is human and can err. He is not sure whether he would accept another assignment that tested him to, or beyond, the limits of his competence. [72] I have carefully considered all of the arguments Mr OX puts forward in support of his position. In

5. [2006] NZEmpC AC 63/06 Whelan v Attorney-General for CE of the Children and Young Persons Service [pdf, 112 KB]

   ...roles, in particular liaison with the Police in relation to threats made to other social workers. [15] There was an issue as to the plaintiff’s qualifications to hold a management position. The defendant called Anne Marie Taggart the Manager of Human Resource Operations, a role she had held since April 2005. Ms Taggart referred to senior positions such as the site manager role and the service centre manager role which, according to their position descriptions, required key acco...

6. Canterbury Westland Standards Committee v Simes [2012] NZLCDT 4 [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...was able to give legal advice regarding the direction or management of proceedings that were reserved areas of work.18 In the case of an incorporated law firm employees would have to be involved in giving the advice (a company operates through its human employees) and there is no requirement that such employees be lawyers. The requirement is only that the incorporated law firm be controlled by a lawyer. [78] As a consequence, Mr Gorringe submitted, the purpose of Section 24 must be t...

7. [2012] NZEmpC 96 South Pacific Meats Ltd v Mohammed [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...upset by this revelation and told Mr Shanks that he would be returning on 3 August 2009 regardless. When questioned, Mr Shanks said that he could not recall such a conversation. [26] Mr Mohammed sought assistance from his friend and previous Human Resources Manager at another plant, Mr Small. Mr Mohammed and his son’s evidence is broadly consistent with what Mr Small had to say. His evidence was that he rang the company on 31 July 2009 and spoke to the receptionist, asking...

8. National Standards Committee v Young [2017] NZLCDT 41 [pdf, 315 KB]

   ...necessary to carefully consider the dicta in the two recent decisions of the High Court and Court of Appeal respectively in Deliu6 and Orlov.7 [45] In Orlov, the Court was considering the conduct of the practitioner in making a complaint to the Human Rights Review Tribunal, which was acknowledged to be a personal claim. At para [110] the Court had this to say: “But again, given that the person alleged to have discriminated is a Judge, the person complaining is a practitioner, a...

9. OIA-97276.pdf [pdf, 7.3 MB]

   ...considered when making an adequacy decision? Article 45 of the GDPR requires the European Commission to take into account the following when deciding whether a country offers an ³DGHTXDWH OHYHO RI SURWHFWLRQ´� x The rule of law, respect for human rights, including laws on public security, defence, national security and criminal law and the access of public authorities to personal data. x Data protection rules, professional rules and security measures, including rules for the onwa...

10. Proposals against incitement of hatred and discrimination - discussion document - Korean [pdf, 587 KB]

    ...시민공간은 https://consultations.justice.govt.nz에서 찾으실 수 있습니다. 이 사이트는 제안에 관한 피드백을 쉽게 제출하실 수 있는 통로입니다. 이메일이나 게시물을 통해 제출하실 수도 있습니다 humanrights@justice.govt.nz로 이메일로 제출하실 수도 있습니다. Human Rights, Ministry of Justice, SX10088, Wellington으로 우편으로 보내실 수도 있습니다. https://consultations.justice.govt.nz/ mailto:humanri...