Chand v Ahuja [2014] NZIACDT 119 (19 December 2014) [pdf, 130 KB]
...paid after he believed his father’s immigration could proceed. Mr Ahuja was willing to refund the fee for the consultation where he was engaged; but thought Global was responsible for the money Mr Chand paid. He says the balance of the fees was for job search services, and he was not personally involved with Mr Chand only his father. [4] The Tribunal has found the fees were procured for immigration services. As the sole licensed immigration adviser in the practice, and the person enga...