Warminister v Flint and Radnorshire LCRO 202 / 2009 (18 February 2010) [pdf, 61 KB]
...can be established by virtue of the fact that the word “disclosure” was not a part of his vocabulary at the time the alleged email was written. [5] A further aspect of the complaint was that the respondents had “perverted the course of justice” by failing to produce to the Complaints Committee in respect of the earlier complaints documents relating to advice on suggested strategy (presumably in the substantive SDC matter). [6] The Standards Committee considered this comp...