8510 items matching your search terms
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2014] NZLCDT 23 LCDT 035/13 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND IN THE MATTER of JOHN EICHELBAUM (name displayed because suppression subsequently discharged) of Auckland, Barrister CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr C Lucas Mr W Smith HEARING on the papers COUNSEL Mr A H Waalkens QC for the Applicant Ms K Davenport QC for t...
1 Budget Sensitive Office of the Minister of Justice and Minister for Courts Chair, Cabinet Social Wellbeing Committee Establishment of Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal Proposal 1 I seek Cabinet’s agreement to establish a Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal (“the Tribunal”), as committed to in the Labour Party’s 2017 election manifesto, to provide an alternative pathway for claimants, the Earthquake Commission (EQC) and insurers to resolve outstan...
1 Budget Sensitive Office of the Minister of Justice and Minister for Courts Chair, Cabinet Social Wellbeing Committee Establishment of Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal Proposal 1 I seek Cabinet’s agreement to establish a Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal (“the Tribunal”), as committed to in the Labour Party’s 2017 election manifesto, to provide an alternative pathway for claimants, the Earthquake Commission (EQC) and insurers to resolve outstan...
...approval and requires a Court of Appeal and Supreme Court lead provider approval for attendance for an appeal against a pre-trial ruling to be heard in the Court of Appeal; • where the applicant has been assigned to represent a client in a criminal matter and the provider approval level increases (e.g. due to additional charges with a higher maximum penalty being laid) but the essential facts of the case have not changed and there is insufficient time to assign a new lawyer;1 • whe...
Part 3 – Complaints Management Operational Policy Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to any person or entity that chooses to rely upon the information....
© Crown Copyright, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Hon Paul Goldsmith Minister of Justice Proactive release – Regulatory Systems (Courts Improvement) Amendment Bill: Additional Amendments Date of issue: 29 January 2025 The following documents have been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circular CO (23) 04. No. Document Comments 1 Regulatory Systems (Justice) Amendment Bill package: Approval for Introdu...
Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 9 May 2024 Our ref: OIA 111348 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Open Government Partnership National Action Plan Thank you for your email of 11 April 2024 requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information relating to New Zealand's Open Government Partnership Fourth National Action Plan. Sp...
...critical witness and his credibility will need to be assessed; (c) costs and efficiencies. [8] BNZ opposes the application. It says there is no important question of law that will arise in the case other than incidentally and that related matters in the Court do not involve sufficiently similar or related issues to the matters Ms Bowen seeks to remove. [9] The related matters currently before the Court are a challenge to the Authority’s non-publication order and for fur...
...been legally represented for at least 12 months. No sufficient explanation has been given for the applicant’s failure to file within time. There are no meritorious grounds for the appeal and no issues of public importance. The interests of justice favour the respondents; b) The learned Judge was entitled to come to all decisions made. She did not act on a wrong principle, make an error in law or take into account irrelevant matters or omit to take into account relevant matters...
...to resolve disputes faster. The Tribunal provides independent adjudication services where all parties are treated impartially. The chair and members of the Tribunal act as adjudicators of leaky home disputes. They are supported by Ministry of Justice staff who provide registration, case management and other administrative services. Adjudication is the legal process of resolving a dispute and issuing a judgment or decision following the hearing. What’s the process for affected...