Search Results

1. SG v UT [2023] NZDT 78 (1 March 2023) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...justified in coming to that decision. 7) The applicant is, therefore, entitled to compensation. I am not prepared to award the applicant the cost of the security cameras she installed. I would not see this as a direct, foreseeable, consequence of the matter before me in relation to which I have jurisdiction, namely, a trespass resulting in damage to a tree. Contextually, I note that this is a situation in which clearly there were branches overhanging the respondent’s land. 8) I a...

2. PNapp pack March 2021 [doc, 75 KB]

   ...Occupation: Current employer: Have you been adjudicated bankrupt? Have you been charged with a criminal offence? If yes, please provide details: Where did you hear about this role/see the role advertised? Are there any other matters which could affect your appointment to the tribunal? Provide details: Tertiary Qualifications Please include details of qualifications achieved, subjects and institution Personal Information The Tribunal en...

3. Wlg app pack March 2021 [doc, 75 KB]

   ...enquiry regarding the position of Tenancy Adjudicator in the Wellington area. Enclosed please find: 1. Application for position 2. Questionnaire form 3. Position Description Your Application Please email your application to: tania.togiatama@justice.govt.nz or post to Principal Tenancy Adjudicator, PO Box 2124, Rotorua 3040. Applications close at 5.00pm on Thursday 15 April 2021. Your application should include: 1. Completed Adjudicator Application form. 2. Completed Questionnaire. 3...

4. IT v UO [2021] NZDT 1578 (11 August 2021) [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...that UO verbally promised to remove the cat door and to tile inside the wardrobe. However, in the absence of any mention of those obligations in either the written contract or the settlement communications, I find that agreement to attend to these matters has not been proven. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 8. IT said that the wardrobe had sliding doors at the time he entered into the agreement and at the time of inspection, but provided evidence that these doors were missing at t...

5. AU v E Ltd [2023] NZDT 253 (30 June 2023) [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...order the deposit paid of $10,000 be refunded in full. 7. The counterclaim fails as there is no evidence the parties agreed AU would pay the sum of $15,000 for COF repairs. In addition, AU believes the bus has been resold by D Ltd. 8. This matter was heard today by teleconference at 2pm, however as a representative of D Ltd did not answer calls made to the number provided, the matter proceeded in their absence. Referee: K. Edwards Date: 30 June 2023 Page 3...

6. Gisborne app pack March 2021 [doc, 75 KB]

   ...Occupation: Current employer: Have you been adjudicated bankrupt? Have you been charged with a criminal offence? If yes, please provide details: Where did you hear about this role/see the role advertised? Are there any other matters which could affect your appointment to the tribunal? Provide details: Tertiary Qualifications Please include details of qualifications achieved, subjects and institution Personal Information The Tribunal en...

7. Tenancy Adjudicator Manawatu - application pack [doc, 68 KB]

   ...(if different): Phone (day): Phone (evening): Email: Occupation: Current employer: Have you been adjudicated bankrupt? Have you been charged with a criminal offence? Please provide details: Are there any other matters which could affect your appointment to the tribunal? Provide details: Tertiary Qualifications Please include details of qualifications achieved, subjects and institution Personal Information The Tribunal encoura...

8. QD v TS [2024] NZDT 124 (13 February 2024) [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...payments made were subject to his employment under the accredited employer immigration scheme and any agreement he would repay the applicant was made under duress as part of his employment1, making the application before the Tribunal an employment matter. [3] Whereas the applicant founds his application in contract, the application cannot be determined on the terms of the contract alone. In employment matters the principles of contract and tort are only one consideration. The partie...

9. SN v X Ltd [2024 NZDT 93 (23 January 2024) [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...issued an apology to SN for its representatives giving him the incorrect advice in a phone call of the 17 April 2023. 3. SN is claiming $30,000.00 for the refund amount and for distress and harassment. 4. There have been two hearings of this matter, at the first hearing on 11 October 2023 it became clear that SN had not received the refunded amount of $51.50 as it had been deposited into a bank account that was not SNs. 5. Since the first hearing X Ltd have investigated the matte...

10. NT v DNR Ltd [2023] NZDT 392 (10 August 2023) [pdf, 104 KB]

    ...orders: The claim is dismissed against both respondents. Reasons 1. NT’s claim involves a dispute arising from his purchase of a house from B D and IN. DNR were BD and IN’s solicitors for the house sale. DN Ltd was not involved in the matter and does not trade (it appears the company was named following correspondence with the Tribunal because NT did not name any legal entity when he first lodged the claim, rather he named ‘DNR’ three times with three different ‘organisa...