Search Results

1. OIA-113637.pdf [pdf, 6.3 MB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 6 August 2024 Ref: OIA 113637 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Ministerial reports Thank you for your email of 1 July 2024 requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act) copies of reports provided to the Minister and Associate Minister of Justice. Specifically, you requested: Under the Official Information Act,...

2. Parenting Through Separation Operating Guidelines 1 July 2018 [pdf, 286 KB]

   ...after consultation with key stakeholders (where practicable). When changes are made, the Ministry will contact providers with the details of these. Feedback on the guidelines is welcome at any time and can be sent to the Ministry at PCS.family@justice.govt.nz. For more information about the guidelines, providers should contact the Ministry Relationship Manager named in their Outcome Agreement. mailto:PCS.family@justice.govt.nz About out of court services ...............

3. [2015] NZEmpC 201 Owen v CE of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...the plaintiff’s claims. He said this: 3 [16] Counsel for Ms Owen have pointed to the fact that since the first investigation meeting was adjourned after one half day, Ms Owen’s claims have been reformulated and in addition there will be injustice to Ms Owen if the investigation continued on the basis that the witnesses, who have already given evidence, are not recalled. I am mindful in dealing with this submission that it is not the function of the Court to advise the Autho...

4. [2016] NZEmpC 43 Pretorius v Marra Construction (2004) Ltd [pdf, 159 KB]

   FREDRICK PRETORIUS v MARRA CONSTRUCTION (2004) LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 43 [19 April 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 43 EMPC 14/2016 IN THE MATTER OF an application for special leave to remove matter to the Employment Court pursuant to s 178(3) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 BETWEEN FREDRICK PRETORIUS Applicant AND MARRA CONSTRUCTION (2004) LIMITED Respondent Hearing: (on the paper...

5. Regulatory Impact Statement: Expungement scheme for historical homosexual convictions [pdf, 101 KB]

   Regulatory Impact Statement Expungement scheme for historical homosexual convictions Agency Disclosure Statement This Regulatory Impact Statement has been prepared by the Ministry of Justice. It provides an analysis of options to address the negative effects of historical convictions for homosexual offences that have been decriminalised. A constraint in carrying out the analysis was uncertainty about the existence of relevant official records, and the level of information contained...

6. [2007] NZEmpC CRC19/07 Abernethy v Dynea NZ Ltd [pdf, 79 KB]

   ABERNETHY V DYNEA NZ LTD CHCH CC 13/07 10 July 2007 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH CC 13/07 CRC 19/07 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN STEPHEN ABERNETHY Plaintiff AND DYNEA NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 18 June 2007 (Heard at Nelson) Court: Chief Judge G L Colgan Judge B S Travis Judge C M Shaw Appearances: Nicole Ironside, Counsel for the Plaintiff Shan Wilson, Counsel...

7. P Ltd v W Ltd [2024] NZDT 16 (17 January 2024) [pdf, 254 KB]

   ...ignored. He says that after leaving the café where he met his friend, he found the car was covered with sand which, he says, has caused damage to the paintwork of the car necessitating the repainting of the car. 4. The procedural background of this matter needs to be understood. Initially NL made an application in his own name in March 2022. A hearing occurred before referee Brennan on 19 July 2022, after which she dismissed the application. The reasons for her decision were:...

8. BT v DC [2020] NZDT 1334 (10 August 2020) [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...had arisen during her relationship with Mr D and for which she believed he was responsible. 4. Ms T has filed a claim seeking the balance of $1,680.00. 5. The issues to be considered are: (a) Does the Tribunal have jurisdiction to consider the matter? (b) If so, is Ms T able to seek restitution from Ms C of the missing funds? Does the Tribunal have jurisdiction to consider the matter? 6. I find that the Tribunal does have jurisdiction to consider the matter, for the following...

9. 2020 NZEnvC 143 Envrionmental Defence Society Incorporated v New Zealand Aluminium Smelters Limited [pdf, 7.2 MB]

   ...proceedings which may include but are not limited to: (a) the orderly and fair administration of justice;9 (b) the right to bring and defend civil proceedings without the disclosure of any more information concerning private or commercially sensitive matters than is necessary to satisfy the principle of open justice;10 (c) the principle of open justice, including the encouragement of fair and accurate reporting of, and comment on, court hearings and decisions;11 and (d) the freedo...

10. UC v K Ltd [2024] NZDT 426 (17 June 2024) [pdf, 188 KB]

    ...[international legislation], an Act of [Country 1], requires that the passenger movement charges are refundable by K Ltd to him, whether or not he paid them. I am unable to apply the Act or enforce it and so whether or not the Act requires this outcome is a matter for the [Country 1] Courts, not those in New Zealand. 10. UC argued that the [Country 1] statutory provisions of the Act are incorporated into the contract he had with K Ltd. In theory, sometimes a statute’s provisions co...