Search Results

1. Shelford v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late appeal to the District Court) [2023] NZACC 31 [pdf, 156 KB]

   ...scheme is minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. [6] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a radical ch...

2. Kaulima v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late appeal to the District Court) [2023] NZACC 33 [pdf, 155 KB]

   ...scheme is minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. [7] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a radical ch...

3. Robinson v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing to the District Court) [2024 NZACC 015 [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...scheme is minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. [7] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: 1 Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board [1973] 2 NZLR 86, 91. 3 When once an appellant al...

4. Moonen v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late appeal to the District Court) [2023] NZACC 57 [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...scheme is minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. [6] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a radical ch...

5. Singh v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late appeal to the District Court) [2022] NZACC 253 [pdf, 156 KB]

   ...scheme is minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. [7] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: 1 Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board [1973] 2 NZLR 86 (CA), at 91. 3 When once an appe...

6. Quigley v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late appeal to the District Court) [2022] NZACC 46 [pdf, 155 KB]

   ...scheme is minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. [6] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a radical ch...

7. Urlich v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing of an appeal to District Court) [2024] NZACC 43 [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...scheme is minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. [6] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a radical cha...

8. Easthope v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late appeal to the District Court) [2023] NZACC 16 [pdf, 156 KB]

   ...scheme is minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. [7] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a radical ch...

9. S Ltd v M Ltd [2024] NZDT 249 (11 March 2024) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...speculating on what a degree of leeway beyond 44 weeks might mean, I consider something in the order of 5 months goes well beyond what is reasonable. 11) I further find that delivery of the forklift within the approximate indicated timeline was a matter of importance, and essentiality, to the applicant to the extent that a failure by the respondent to do what was promised (delivery “approx. 44 weeks” from the order) would entitle the applicant to cancel, the contract and recover...

10. Giles v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal) [2022] NZACC 236 [pdf, 159 KB]

    ...then his position suffers a radical change. Whereas previously he was in a position to appeal as of right, he now becomes an applicant for a grant of an indulgence by the Court. The onus rests on him to satisfy that in all the circumstances the justice of the case requires that he be given the opportunity to attack the judgment from which he wishes to appeal. [7] In Almond v Read,2 Arnold J (for the Supreme Court) outlined the following principles to guide the exercise of the di...