Search Results

1. [2025] NZEmpC 60 Courage & Ors-Pilgrim & Ors v Attorney-General & Ors [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT, LABOUR INSPECTORATE [2025] NZEmpC 60 [1 April 2025] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2025] NZEmpC 60 EMPC 363/2021 IN THE MATTER OF a declaration under s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for judicial review AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for a stay of proceedings BETWEEN HOSEA COURAG...

2. Potaka-Dewes v Kereama - Whakarewarewa 2B (2016) 142 Waiariki MB 281 (142 WAR 281) [pdf, 230 KB]

   142 Waiariki MB 281 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20150006323 UNDER Section 43, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Whakarewarewa 2B Block – Rehearing of applications A20150004545 and A20150004856 BETWEEN KIRI POTAKA-DEWES, KAREN WALMSLEY AND MEREHEENI HOOKER Applicants AND KATARAINA KEREAMA AND DONNA HALL Respondents Hearings: 8 April 2016 8 June 2016 (Heard at Rotorua)...

3. TQ v FW LCRO 214/2015 (27 September 2016) [pdf, 64 KB]

   ...Introduction [1] Mr TQ has applied for a review of a decision by the Wellington Standards Committee [X] to take no further action in respect of his complaint concerning the conduct of the respondent, Ms FW. Background [2] Mr TQ’s lawyer in family matters is Ms JP. [3] Mr TQ is sole director of “TQ Holdings Limited” (the company).1 1 Evidence of TQ at review hearing. The company was represented by a lawyer in an employmen...

4. Regulatory Impact Statement Family Court Review [pdf, 174 KB]

   1   FAMILY COURT REVIEW: REGULATORY IMPACT STATEMENT Agency Disclosure Statement  The Ministry of Justice prepared this Regulatory Impact Statement. It analyses policy options that aim to create a modern, accessible family justice system that is responsive to children and vulnerable people. The focus is on cases under the Care of Children Act 2004 as that is where there is greatest potential to improve responsiveness to children while also addressing cost pressures. The key gaps,...

5. BORA Family Court Proceedings Reform Bill [pdf, 326 KB]

   ...additional fees and costs. 3. A number of the proposals engage s 27 of the NZBORA. We consider that there are however sufficient exceptions, and sufficient protections in the system as a whole, to avoid any breach of that right. Right to justice, s 27 NZBORA 4. The right to natural justice is inherently flexible and context-specific. Its requirements depend heavily on the statutory framework in question and nature of the power being exercised. The existing Family Court fra...

6. [2017] EmpC 92 P v A [pdf, 111 KB]

   P v A NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 92 [28 July 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 92 EMPC 62/2017 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application by the defendant for leave to extend time to file a statement of defence BETWEEN P Plaintiff AND A Defendant EMPC 170/2017 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the...

7. WU v QD [2021] NZDT 1613 (27 July 2021) [pdf, 270 KB]

   ...being sold? b. Was there incorrect information provided to WU prior to his purchasing the caravan? Do the objective meanings of the alleged misrepresentations reasonably convey incorrect information? c. Can there be misrepresentations about matters which QD would not have been aware of? d. If there are any proven incorrect statements conveyed did they induce WU to enter the contract? e. If a misrepresentation is made out, what are the damages required to place WU in the posit...

8. [2022] NZEmpC 163 Matajod v Crazy Horse Ltd [pdf, 249 KB]

   ...discretion to grant an extension of time to take various steps, including to file a statement of defence or a cross challenge.4 The discretion is to be exercised in accordance with principle. The overarching consideration is the interests of justice. The usual factors that will be considered are:5 • the reasons for the omission to file within time; • the length of the delay; • any prejudice or hardship to any other person; • the effect on the rights and liabilities...

9. The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 413) v Mairs [2018] NZREADT 41 [pdf, 190 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2018] NZREADT 41 READT 040/17 IN THE MATTER OF A charge laid under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 A An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BOUGHT BY THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 413) AGAINST GEOFFREY MAIRS Defendant Hearing: 25 July 2018, at Auckland Tribunal: Mr J Doogue, Deputy Chairperson Mr G Denley, Member Ms C Sand...

10. Committee of Management of Waipiro A13 v Haig - Waipiroa A13 Incorporation (2008) 182 Gisborne MB 7 (182 GIS 7) [pdf, 269 KB]

    i --"-W ' , ,~) ~' ,::!) lftV 182 Gisborne MB 7 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAIRA WHITI DISTRICT Hearing: Judgment: Introduction A20080002246 UNDER Section 43(2) ofTe Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Waipiro A13 Incorporation BETWEEN COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT OF WAIPIROA13 AND 13 March 2008 (Heard at Wellington) 30 July 2008 . Applicants MILTON D HAIG AND WILLIAM K HAIG ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF W T HAIG Respondents RESER...