8539 items matching your search terms
BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: Reference No: IACDT 029/14 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar Between Manit Ly Complainant AND Rosemarie Navarette-Scholes Adviser DECISION (IMPOSING SANCTIONS) REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Ms S Blick, lawyer, M...
...Court has a discretion to grant an extension of time to take various steps: s 219 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act). The discretion is to be exercised in accordance with principle. The overarching consideration is the interests of justice. The usual factors that will be considered (where relevant) are the reasons for the omission to file within time; the length of the delay; any prejudice or hardship to any other person; the effect on the rights and liabilities of the...
...of this decision by the LCRO must be made within 30 working days after the date of this decision. An application for review must be on the prescribed form and accompanied by the prescribed fee of $30.67. The LCRO may be contacted by email: lcro@justice.govt.nz; Telephone: 0800 367 6838; Post: Private Bag 92020, Victoria Street West, Auckland 1142. web: www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/legal-complaints-review-officer/contact-us” [4] On 31 December 2010, the Applicant sent an email...
...VULCAN STEEL LIMITED v MANUFACTURING & CONSTRUCTION WORKERS UNION [2021] NZEmpC 50 [22 April 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2021] NZEmpC 50 EMPC 40/2021 IN THE MATTER OF an application to extend time to file a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN VULCAN STEEL LIMITED Applicant AND MANUFACTURING & CONSTRUCTION WORKERS UNION Responden...
...having had regard to the memoranda filed in support of the parties’ respective positions, I granted the application. My reasons for doing so follow. [5] In deciding an application for an adjournment the Court must be guided by the need to do justice between the parties. Also relevant is the public interest in achieving the most efficient use of court resources, and the affect of an adjournment on others in the litigation queue. [6] Ms Mayes has been instructed to act as lead...
...problem on her property, on the basis that NI Ltd has not met the implied warranties in the Building Act 2004. 4. The issues to determine are: • Does the Disputes Tribunal have jurisdiction to hear a claim against B Council in relation to this matter? • Does the drainage work at and near the retaining wall at the rear of the section comply with the warranties contained in the Building Act 2004? • If not, what remedy is available to Mrs D? Does the Disputes Tribunal ha...
FGH v RST NZEmpC WELLINGTON [2018] NZEmpC 145 [6 December 2018] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2018] NZEmpC 145 EMPC 259/2017 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for a permanent non- publication order BETWEEN FGH Plaintiff AND RST Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: S Henderson and D H O’Leary, counsel f...
...APPLICANT TQ Limited RESPONDENT MQ The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. The claim is struck out. 2. A rehearing will be granted if TQ Limited provides a ruling from the Employment Relations Authority stating that the matter is outside its jurisdiction. Reasons: 1. On 2 May 2016, Mr Q was hired as an employee of TQ Limited, a recruitment agency, and started work as a temporary hoist operator and warehouse storeman at EU, one of TQ’s clients. In September...
...and disbursements awarded by the Authority. [6] The application is based on three grounds: (a) there is no material prejudice to Mr Nicolle if it is granted; (b) the balance of convenience favours granting leave; and (c) the interests of justice favour granting leave. 2 Nicolle v Goleman Wellington Cleaning Ltd [2019] NZERA 113. 3 Goleman Wellington Cleaning Ltd v Nicolle [2019] NZEmpC 51. [7] The application was suppo...
...expert witnesses to confer and identify the issues on which they agree, with reasons. They are also to clearly identify the issues on which they cannot agree and give reasons for their disagreement. This will enable the court to focus primarily on matters that remain in dispute, while understanding the basis for agreed matters. General Directions All parties calling expert1 evidence on this topic are to provide their respective experts with a copy of the Environment Court...