Search Results

1. Goette v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing to the District Court) [2024] NZACC 96 (4 June 2024) [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...scheme is minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. [6] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a radical ch...

2. DD v KI [2023] NZDT 42 (14 February 2023).pdf [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...the decision of X Ltd as to whether his car was to be written off or not. I was given no evidence that X Ltd had advised him to sell it. Rather, X Ltd had asked him to obtain a pre- accident valuation, and DD co-operated with X Ltd in dealing with the matter. The reason that the storage CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 period ran into several months was that KI had intimated to X Ltd, his insurer, that he was disputing liability. That was not DD’s fault. Thus, I consider that...

3. DD TU v BM [2021] NZDT 1607 (10 August 2021) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...their caravan. [3] Seven weeks later, the applicants took the vehicle for a service at D Ltd (“D Ltd”), where it had been serviced on occasions during the period that BM had owned it. The applicants said that there were some relatively minor matters which needed attention. However, the mechanic who dealt with them drew their attention to a leaking head gasket. He informed them that it could blow at any time, and that they should not use the car for towing. He warned them that they s...

4. Jones v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing to the District Court) [2024] NZACC 163 (15 October 2024) [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...scheme is minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. [7] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: 1 Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board [1973] 2 NZLR 86, 91. 3 When once an appellant all...

5. Walters v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late Filing of an Appeal to the District Court) [2024] NZACC 168 (22 October 2024) [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...scheme is minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. [7] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a radical cha...

6. G Ltd v C Ltd [2024] NZDT 506 (25 June 2024) [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...established that she meant her submissions in response to the claim which contained no reference to sums that C Ltd had spent or wished to claim. She did then state at the hearing that she wished to lodge a formal counter-claim. 5. Given that this matter has been through a rehearing process (because the respondent did not receive notices prior to the first hearing), and that the rehearing decision states that any counter-claim needed to be lodged in good time before the further hearing...

7. LR v U Ltd [2024] NZDT 459 (20 June 2024) [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 459 APPLICANT LR RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. U Ltd is to pay $2,304.34 to LR on or before 9 July 2024. 2. This order is to be emailed and posted to the parties. Reasons: 3. The matter has previously been adjourned as SE, U Ltd said he had not received Notice of the Hearing. U Ltd’s contact details were updated in that hearing. 4. LR is seeking $2,304.34 in compensation for the damage she claims U Ltd caused w...

8. Old v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing of appeal to the District court) [2024] NZACC 151 (24 September 2024) [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...scheme is minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. [7] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a radical ch...

9. Tierney v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing to the District Court) [2024] NZACC 174 (6 November 2024) [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...scheme is minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. [7] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a radical ch...

10. Singh v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing to the District Court) [2024] NZACC 178 (11 November 2024) [pdf, 149 KB]

    ...scheme is minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. [6] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a radical ch...