8562 items matching your search terms
KIDS REPUBLIC PLAYLAND LIMITED v KYLIE JEAN LOWE NZEmpC WELLINGTON [2017] NZEmpC 134 [6 November 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2017] NZEmpC 134 EMPC 190/2017 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for stay of proceedings BETWEEN KIDS REPUBLIC PLAYLAND LIMITED Plaintiff AND KYLIE JEAN LOWE Defendant Hearing: (on papers filed 6...
ITE v ALA NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 211 [1 December 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 211 EMPC 196/2015 IN THE MATTER OF an application for order removing interim non-publication orders AND IN THE MATTER of an application for order allowing video recording of employment hearing BETWEEN ITE Plaintiff AND ALA Defendant Hearing: By way of telephone conference on 26 November 2015 following paper...
BRUCE WHITE, IAN HARRISON, PETER KATZ, PETER LEDINGHAM AND DAVID ARCHER V RESERVE BANK OF NEW ZEALAND NZEmpC WN [2012] NZEmpC 125 [1 August 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2012] NZEmpC 125 WRC 17/10 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed in full from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN BRUCE WHITE, IAN HARRISON, PETER KATZ, PETER LEDINGHAM AND DAVID ARCHER Plaintiffs AND RESERVE BANK OF NEW ZEALAND Defendant Hearing: (on the pap...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2025] NZACC 097 ACAR 36/25 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN LEIGH HUNTER Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the Papers Appearances: The Applicant is self-represented H.H. Ifwersen and Reuben Hindriksen for the Respondent Judgment: 13 June 20...
PRESENTATION BY PRINCIPAL ENVIRONMENT JUDGE LAURIE NEWHOOK TO DELEGATION OF GUIZHOU PROVINCE JUDGES AUGUST 2015 (A detailed update from a speech delivered by him to the GLOBAL JUSTICE ECOFORUM Guiyang City, China, July 2013) THE CONSTITUTION, WORK, POWERS AND PRACTICES OF THE NZ ENVIRONMENT COURT Introduction [1] In 2013 I had the privilege of addressing a very large conference of Judges of Chinese Environment Courts in Guiyang City, along with senior Judges from Sy...
WAKA KOTAHI NZ TRANSPORT AGENCY v MANAWATŪ-WHANGANUI REGIONAL COUNCIL BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 44 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of the proposed direct referral of applications for resource consents for activities associated with Te Ahu a Turanga: Manawatū Tararua Highway Project AND IN THE MATTER of an originating application under sections 281 and 291 Resource Management Act for...
WAKA KOTAHI NZ TRANSPORT AGENCY v MANAWATŪ-WHANGANUI REGIONAL COUNCIL BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 44 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of the proposed direct referral of applications for resource consents for activities associated with Te Ahu a Turanga: Manawatū Tararua Highway Project AND IN THE MATTER of an originating application under sections 281 and 291 Resource Management Act for...
HARVEY DOUGLAS WHITE (FORMERLY "X") V AUCKLAND DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD AK AC 10A/07 [15 October 2007] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 10A/07 ARC 52/05 IN THE MATTER OF personal grievances removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN HARVEY DOUGLAS WHITE (FORMERLY "X") Plaintiff AND AUCKLAND DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions filed on...
ANNA DAVIDSON v GREAT BARRIER AIRLINES LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 46 [5 May 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 46 EMPC 316/2016 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for security for costs BETWEEN ANNA DAVIDSON Plaintiff AND GREAT BARRIER AIRLINES LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers filed on 27 March, 19,...
...v A,6 the statements in An Employee v An Employer must now be read in light of the Supreme Court’s judgment in Almond v Read.7 In that judgment, the Supreme Court emphasised that the ultimate question in such a case is what the interests of justice require. It modified the approach which needs to be 5 An Employee v An Employer [2007] ERNZ 295 (EmpC). 6 P v A [2017] NZEmpC 92, [2017] ERNZ 504 at [21]. 7 Almond v Read [2017] NZSC 80, [2017] 1 NZLR 801. taken as to th...