[2022] NZEmpC 140 Wiles v The Vice-Chancellor of the University of Auckland [pdf, 222 KB]
...asserts there is no prejudice to the University as, at the time the application was filed, there was still over seven weeks to the hearing, and the University had not yet filed its briefs of evidence. Ms Stewart submits it is in the interests of justice that the intended amended statement of claim be accepted so that all Dr Wiles’ concerns can be fairly heard in the impending Court case. [11] The University opposes the substantive amendments sought. First, the University say...