Search Results

1. [2022] NZACC 105 - Martin v Accident Compensation Corporation (1 June 2022) [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...with the result that an extension of time should generally be granted, desirably without opposition from the respondent. [38] The ultimate question when considering the exercise of the discretion to extend time under r 29A is what the interests of justice require. That necessitates an assessment of the particular circumstances of the case. Factors which are likely to require consideration include: 1 Almond v Read [2017] NZSC 80, [2017] 1 NZLR 801, (2017) 23 PRNZ 533. 3 (a)...

2. Pristine Property v Accident Compensation Corporation (Costs on Appeal) [2024] NZACC 016 [pdf, 170 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 016 ACR 46/22 ACR 165/22 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT BETWEEN PRISTINE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE LIMITED Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Judgment: On the Papers Heard at: Wellington/Whanganui-A-Tara Appearances: Mr I Stryder...

3. Steinbauer v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal) [2022] NZACC 238 [pdf, 151 KB]

   ...with the result that an extension of time should generally be granted, desirably without opposition from the respondent. [38] The ultimate question when considering the exercise of the discretion to extend time under r 29A is what the interests of justice require. That necessitates an assessment of the particular circumstances of the case. Factors which are likely to require consideration include: (a) The length of the delay. Clearly, the time period between the expiry of the appe...

4. [2017] NZEnvC 099 Auckland Council [pdf, 126 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT IN THE MATTER BETWEEN Decision [2017] NZEnvC Oq C1 of potential appeals under the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (LGATPA) and the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) following the High Court's Judgment in The Straits Protection Society Incorporated v Auckland Council [2017] NZHC 1351 AUCKLAND COUNCIL (ENV-2016-AKL-000171 ) Applicant Court: Principal Environment Judge LJ Newhook Date of Decision: ~ JVI (...

5. BORA Children Young Persons & Their Families (Youth Courts Jurisdiction & Orders) Amendment Bill [pdf, 304 KB]

   ...recommends a minimum age of criminal responsibility of 14 or 16 years. [2] 6. In applying s 25(i) in light of that recommendation, it is important to note that the existing legislation provides a specialised and highly responsive scheme for youth justice matters that requires acknowledgement and accommodation of the needs of young people, including a presumption towards the least restrictive response that is appropriate in the particular case.[3] These provisions supplement and facilita...

6. [2020] NZEmpC 83 Hurst v Hodgson [pdf, 168 KB]

   WARREN JOHN HURST v JACOB HODGSON [2020] NZEmpC 83 [11 June 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2020] NZEmpC 83 EMPC 123/2020 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to extend time to file challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN WARREN JOHN HURST Applicant AND JACOB HODGSON Respondent Hearing: On the papers...

7. [2022] NZACC 87 – Needham v ACC (11 May 2022) [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...following principles to guide the exercise of the discretion to grant or deny an extension of time to lodge an appeal: [38] The ultimate question when considering the exercise of the discretion to extend time under r 29A is what the interests of justice require. That necessitates an assessment of the particular circumstances of the case. Factors which are likely to require consideration include: (a) The length of the delay. Clearly, the time period between the expiry of the appe...

8. BORA Immigration Advisers Licensing Bill [pdf, 295 KB]

   ...further advice should this prove necessary. 3. The Bill establishes an occupational licensing framework under which only those individuals and organisations that hold licenses are authorised to provide potential migrants with advice on immigration matters, unless they are exempted. 4. The Bill is directed at ensuring that the interests of potential migrants are protected when receiving immigration advice and that New Zealand's reputation as a migration destination of choice is enh...

9. [2022] NZACC 57 - McCarthy v ACC (5 April 2022) [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...following principles to guide the exercise of the discretion to grant or deny an extension of time to lodge an appeal: [38] The ultimate question when considering the exercise of the discretion to extend time under r 29A is what the interests of justice require. That necessitates an assessment of the particular circumstances of the case. Factors which are likely to require consideration include: (a) The length of the delay. Clearly, the time period between the expiry of the appe...

10. [2022] NZACC 95 - Watson v ACC (19 May 2022) [pdf, 168 KB]

    ...following principles to guide the exercise of the discretion to grant or deny an extension of time to lodge an appeal: [38] The ultimate question when considering the exercise of the discretion to extend time under r 29A is what the interests of justice require. That necessitates an assessment of the particular circumstances of the case. Factors which are likely to require consideration include: (a) The length of the delay. Clearly, the time period between the expiry of the appe...