Search Results

1. [2022] NZACC 117 – Tibble v ACC (16 June 2022) [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...with the result that an extension of time should generally be granted, desirably without opposition from the respondent. [38] The ultimate question when considering the exercise of the discretion to extend time under r 29A is what the interests of justice require. That necessitates an assessment of the particular circumstances of the case. Factors which are likely to require consideration include: (a) The length of the delay. Clearly, the time period between the expiry of the appe...

2. [2022] NZACC 61 - Foster v ACC (13 April 2022) [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...following principles to guide the exercise of the discretion to grant or deny an extension of time to lodge an appeal: [38] The ultimate question when considering the exercise of the discretion to extend time under r 29A is what the interests of justice require. That necessitates an assessment of the particular circumstances of the case. Factors which are likely to require consideration include: (a) The length of the delay. Clearly, the time period between the expiry of the appe...

3. [2023] NZEmpC 207 The Pho House Ltd T/A Zeke v Branford [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...must be obtained from the Court, otherwise the Authority’s orders remain enforceable and must be complied with.2 [4] The Court may order a stay where it considers it appropriate to do so.3 The overarching consideration is the interests of justice, guided by the Court’s equity and good conscience jurisdiction conferred by s 189 of the Act. The Court will generally have regard to factors such as whether the challenge will be rendered ineffectual if the stay is not granted; whe...

4. [2007] NZEmpC CC 8/07 Employee v Employer [pdf, 87 KB]

   ...extension should be granted. [2] The applicant is employed by the respondent as a secondary school teacher. That employment began in 2001 and remains ongoing. Because the parties remain in an employment relationship, it is in the interests of justice that the employment relationship problem which has existed between them for the last several years not be made public. These proceedings will therefore be subject to an order prohibiting the publication of the names of the parties or...

5. Interpreter’s Code of Conduct [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...Central Registry if they are contacted by anyone about a case. The Ministry will investigate the matter and respond as appropriate. Interpreters and Language Service Providers (LSPs) must act in accordance with the Ministry’s Privacy Guidelines for Justice Providers, the Privacy Act 2020, and any other relevant obligations. The Ministry’s Privacy Guidelines for providers of Justice Services is a useful resource to help interpreters manage information in a way that is confidential,...

6. [2009] NZEmpC AC 54/08 A v The Internet Company of NZ [pdf, 31 KB]

   A V THE INTERNET COMPANY OF NEW ZEALAND AK AC 54/08 16 February 2009 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 54/08 ARC 84/08 IN THE MATTER OF application for orders to disclose particular documents before proceeding commenced and name suppression BETWEEN A Applicant AND THE INTERNET COMPANY OF NEW ZEALAND Respondent Hearing: By submissions filed on 8, 10 and 23 December 2008 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: Michael O'Brien, counsel for the plaintif...

7. KI v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing of an appeal to District Court) [2024] NZACC 52 [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...scheme is minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. [9] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a radical ch...

8. [2019] NZEmpC 13 Rayner v Director-General of Health [pdf, 281 KB]

   AMANDA RAYNER v DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF HEALTH [2019] NZEmpC 13 [11 February 2019] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2019] NZEmpC 13 EMPC 439/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN AMANDA RAYNER Plaintiff AND DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF HEALTH Defendant EMPC 14/2019 AND IN THE MATTER of an applic...

9. Alice Wouters v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 412) & Thomas Richadson [2017] NZREADT 60 [pdf, 184 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2017] NZREADT 60 READT 022/17 IN THE MATTER OF An Appeal under Section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN ALICE WOUTERS Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 412) First Respondent AND THOMAS RICHARDSON Second Respondent On the papers Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews (Chairperson) Mr G Denley (Member) Ms N Dangen (Member) S...

10. T Ltd v X Ltd [2023] NZDT 521 (28 September 2023) [pdf, 107 KB]

    ...X Ltd, represented by CS, the cost of repair work that it carried out for a client insured by X Ltd. X Ltd accepts that it had authorised and approved the work and payment for it, but says that it has paid the sum owing. [2] The facts of this matter are, so far as they are known, not in dispute. T Ltd carried out repair work on X Ltd’s client’s vehicle in November 2022. X Ltd accepted that its client, the vehicle owner, had cover for the repair costs, and T Ltd invoiced X Ltd for...