Search Results

1. HU v UX [2022] NZDT 115 (20 September 2022) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...certificate, or to have the gas reticulation system certified before selling the van and therefore HU’s claim in this regard is dismissed. Is HU entitled to damages in compensation and if so, how much? 18. HU and UX have agreed to settle some minor matters set out in Clause 11 above by a $200 payment from UX. 19. I have found there were misrepresentations in respect of the fridge and heater. 20. In respect of the fridge, the quote from O Company Ltd (Mr DB) shows that the lab...

2. TS v SQ Ltd [2024] NZDT 538 (10 July 2024) [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...Ltd is liable to pay the cost of his new flights form [Destination City] to [Departure City], a night’s accommodation in [Departure City] that he was required to book, and the international mobile phone call costs he incurred trying to sort the matter out while in [Destination City] . The total claimed in $1,885.82. 2. The issues to be resolved are: a. Has there been a breach of contract by SQ Ltd? b. Has there been a breach of the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 by SQ Ltd? c. If t...

3. BN v AW [2020] NZDT 1480 (8 October 2020) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...replacing the fence. On 1 July 2020, AW issued a cross notice disputing any contribution on the basis that the fence had been removed before the fencing notice was issued, and the pre-existing fence had been adequate. 4. BN filed a claim to have the matter determined by the Disputes Tribunal. 5. The issues to be resolved are: (a) Was the old fence “adequate”? (b) If not, how much can be claimed as a contribution to the replacement fence? Was the existing fence “adequate�...

4. TD & LP v KK & F Ltd [2024] NZDT 688 (10 September 2024) [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...Tribunal hearings. The total claimed amount was $5,590.00 5. A first hearing on 19 June 2024 was adjourned because it appeared that KK had not received notice of the claim and the hearing and to allow F Ltd to be added as a respondent. 6. The matter was next scheduled to be heard face to face at 9.15am on Thursday 29 August 2024. TD and LP appeared in person. Despite calling the matter at 9.15am and again at 9.25am there was no appearance by KK or F Ltd and the hearing went ahea...

5. [2025] NZEmpC 32 ZUW v WFW [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAMES AND IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF THE PARTIES AND OTHER PERSONS IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2025] NZEmpC 32 EMPC 230/2024 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for a non-publication order BETWEEN ZUW Plaintiff AND WFW Defendant Hearing:...

6. LCRO 097/2023 RQ and EP v OM (14 February 2024) [pdf, 288 KB]

   ...be vacated based on further documentation, the nature of which is unspecified.2 This request was declined. [21] A hearing was then held for formal proof of the strike-out application. The respondent instructed an agent to appear. Although the matter had been set down for formal proof, the Court gave the agent leave to make submissions as to why Mr X’s application should not be struck out. [22] The outcome was that Mr X’s protection order application was struck out. The Court mi...

7. LCRO Annual Report 2010 [pdf, 517 KB]

   ...Jurisdictional issues ................................................................................................................................ 8 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ PROCEDURAL MATTERS Hearings .................................................................................................................................................. 8 Review on the papers ..............................................

8. Real Estate Agents Disciplinary Tribunal Annual Report 2019-20 [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...30 June 2020 Presented to the House of Representatives pursuant to regulation 17 (b) of the Real Estate Agents (Complaints and Discipline) Regulations 2009 Page | 2 Hon. Aupito Sio Associate Minister of Justice Pursuant to regulation 17(b) of the Real Estate Agents (Complaints and Discipline) Regulations 2009, I have pleasure in presenting the annual report of the Real Estate Agents Disciplinary Tribunal for the 12 months ended 30 June 202...

9. Watene raua ko Ema Kawiti Whānau Trust v Kawiti - Motatau 2 Section 65A (2016) 139 Taitokerau MB 136 (139 TTK 136) [pdf, 74 KB]

   ...January 2014, the respondent moved onto the block. The applicant contends that the respondent advised him that he was going to do so, but he did not first obtain authorisation from the other trustees. The respondent accepts this but raises other matters in his defence, including that he did so to assist his mother, and to look after the farm. 139 Taitokerau MB 138 [7] The respondent is no longer residing on the block. Due to other circumstances, he is currently residing i...

10. [2022] NZACC 47 – Kelly v ACC (22 March 2022) [pdf, 157 KB]

    ...following principles to guide the exercise of the discretion to grant or deny an extension of time to lodge an appeal: [38] The ultimate question when considering the exercise of the discretion to extend time under r 29A is what the interests of justice require. That necessitates an assessment of the particular circumstances of the case. Factors which are likely to require consideration include: (a) The length of the delay. Clearly, the time period between the expiry of the appe...