8579 items matching your search terms
BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2014] NZIACDT 113 Reference No: IACDT 012/12 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar BETWEEN Yewen Xu Complainant AND Sui Schep Noon Adviser DECISION IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS REPRESENTATION: Registrar: In...
...ALLAN GEOFFREY HALSE v EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS AUTHORITY [2023] NZEmpC 215 [30 November 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2023] NZEmpC 215 EMPC 25/2022 IN THE MATTER OF an application for judicial review AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for stay of proceedings AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for a non-publication order BETWEEN ALLAN GEOFFREY HALSE Appli...
MAPU TOMO v CHECKMATE PRECISION CUTTING TOOLS LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC [21 May 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 80 ARC 99/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application by the defendant for security for costs and stay of proceedings BETWEEN MAPU TOMO Plaintiff AND CHECKMATE PRECISION CUTTING TOOLS LIMITED Defenda...
TANE MAHUNU PUTAANGA v MOVE FREIGHT LIMITED [2024] NZEmpC 161 [27 August 2024] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2024] NZEmpC 161 EMPC 301/2023 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN TANE MAHUNU PUTAANGA Plaintiff AND MOVE FREIGHT LIMITED Defendant Hearing:...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 083 ACR 199/22 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162(1) OF THE ACT BETWEEN GRAHAME SAVAGE Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Submissions: Applicant is self-represented H Ifwersen and R Hindriksen for respondent Hearing: On the papers J...
JUDITH ANN DAVIDSON v STEPHEN ROBERT KELLY NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 31 [17 March 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 31 EMPC 269/2014 IN THE MATTER OF an application to enforce a compliance order under s 138 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 BETWEEN JUDITH ANN DAVIDSON Plaintiff AND STEPHEN ROBERT KELLY Defendant EMPC 282/2014 AND IN THE MATTER of a challenge and an application to have a...
...practitioners led a “road-show” around New Zealand specifically on this topic. The road-show took the form of a workshop conducted in 8 regional centres around the country. At its conclusion I prepared a paper describing the topics covered and the many matters discussed and learned by all participants including ourselves. [2] I recommend that registrants to the current conference read that paper, rather than I should repeat its contents here. It is called Report of Steering Group f...
...2. We have concluded that the Bill appears to be consistent with the Bill of Rights Act. In reaching this conclusion, we considered potential issues of inconsistency with section 21 (unreasonable search and seizure) and section 27 (right to justice) of the Bill of Rights Act. Our analysis of these potential issues is set out below. 3. The Bill seeks to: • enable New Zealand to comply with the minimum legislative requirements of the Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturin...
...Amendment Bill Our Ref: ATT395/222 1. We have reviewed the Evidence Amendment Bill (Bill). We advise it appears to be consistent with the rights and freedoms in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (Bill of Rights Act). 2. The Ministry of Justice considers the Bill is largely in its final form but consultations with other government departments continue. We will advise you of any significant changes that affect this advice. General comments 3. In February 2012, the Hon Judith...
...to the enactment of the CYPF Act and the introduction of the Lay Advocate role. It is important to understand these influences. In the period leading to the enactment of the CYPF Act in 1989, there were mounting concerns that the then youth justice system was ‘welfarist’, mono-cultural and did not accurately represent or include the views of the families and communities that it served. Young people, their families and communities felt frustrated and disempowered by the formal...