8579 items matching your search terms
JOHN MATSUOKA v LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LTD NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 174 [20 December 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 174 ARC 23/12 and ARC 102/13 IN THE MATTER OF an application for preservation orders against non-parties BETWEEN JOHN MATSUOKA Plaintiff AND LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 20 December 2016 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: M O'Brien, counsel for pl...
NEW ZEALAND MEAT WORKERS & RELATED TRADES UNION INC v AFFCO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 165 [23 September 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 165 EMPC 152/2015 IN THE MATTER OF an application for injunction AND IN THE MATTER an application for leave to amend pleadings BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND MEAT WORKERS & RELATED TRADES UNION INC First Plaintiff AND ROBERTA KEREWAI RATU AND ORS...
...(NO. 3) LIMITED (formerly known as ASPARONA LIMITED) [2022] NZEmpC 229 [9 December 2022] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2022] NZEmpC 229 EMPC 130/2019 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN AHMED ALKAZAZ Plaintiff AND DELOITTE (NO. 3) LIMITED (formerly known...
...OI, a complainant, that the Committee had resolved that its enquiry into his complaint (made on behalf of his company) would be deferred pending the outcome of civil proceedings that had meanwhile been filed in relation to substantially the same matters arising in the complaint. The complaint is against law practitioner Mr WZ of CAZ. [2] Mr OI, through his legal representative, BAH (per Mr WX) objected to the Standards Committee deferring the matter, and when he was unable to persu...
...confidence, the requirement for a public register, and the fact that Tribunal hearings are in public, there is a presumption in favour of publication. This is consistent with the policy as to publication evident in ss 63 to 66, and the principles of open justice, transparency, and freedom of speech.11 [23] As noted earlier, the Tribunal may make an order to restrict publication if it considers it “proper to do so”. This will require the Tribunal to weigh the public interest in publi...
...of the dispute. This extinguishes the prior rights and bars the parties from re-litigating the outcome.1 12. The reasoning behind the doctrine is that litigation should be final (barring an appeal) to protect the integrity and efficiency of the justice system. The doctrine is designed to prevent a party from bringing a claim more than once if that particular claim has been subjected to a final judgment by a Court or Tribunal of competent jurisdiction. If either Referee Brennan’s...
NANZHENG LIU V SOUTH PACIFIC TIMBER (1990) LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2012] NZEmpC 129 [2 August 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2012] NZEmpC 129 ARC 65/11 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for security for costs and stay of proceedings BETWEEN NANZHENG LIU Plaintiff AND SOUTH PACIFIC TIMBER (1990) LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 17 July 2012 (Heard at Auc...
...both the Court and the Employment Relations Authority have broad powers to make orders of this sort, including (where appropriate) on their own initiative.1 While the applicant has not sought such orders, I consider them to be in the interests of justice. Naming the applicant would effectively identify the first and second respondents. For this reason the order will extend to the name and identifying details of the applicant. [6] There is accordingly an interim order prohibiting...
...4 the issues that are relevant to the Court when it considers costs. The issues articulated in the Practice Note are "not a set of inflexible rules", they are a guide only, however the preamble to the Practice Note states that the matters outlined in it "will be followed unless there is good reason to do otherwise." [14] Paragrapgh 6.6(d) lists five factors that are commonly referred to and given weight if they are present in a case. They are: (a) Where argu...
...AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TE TAITOKERAU In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Taitokerau District A20200007167 A20200007168 WĀHANGA Under Sections 18(1)(a) and 18(1)(h), Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Whenuanui 2B DEPUTY REGISTRAR Kaitono Applicant Nohoanga: Hearing On the papers (Heard at Chambers, Whangarei) Kanohi kitea: Appearances K Davenport QC for Mr and Mrs Kidd D Wac...