8579 items matching your search terms
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ENV-2020-AKL-000083 AUCKLAND REGISTRY I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal under clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Act against the decision of the Waikato Regional Council on Proposed Plan Change 1 to the Waikato Regional Plan BETWEEN OJI FIBRE SOLUTIONS (NZ) LIMITED Appellant AND WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2014] NZREADT 19 READT 039/13 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN LUKE DOMB Applicant AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY Respondent MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Mr G Denley - Member Ms C Sandelin - Member HEARD ON THE PAPERS DATE OF SUBSTANTIVE DECISION 24 January 2014 ([2014] NZREADT 5) DATE OF THIS DECISION 18 March...
BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2016] NZIACDT 52 Reference No: IACDT 048/15 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar BETWEEN Liekina Vailea Complainant AND Hakaoro Hakaoro Adviser DECISION (SANTIONS) REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Ms A Skadiang, Min...
...that he could provide his supporting reasons one week after the application form was received at this Office. That decision was an administrative decision made without reference to myself. Consequently I am not conflicted in considering this matter. Decision [9] The form for applications to review Standards Committee determinations is prescribed by the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Legal Complaints Review Officer) Form and Fee Regulations 2008. [10] Part 7 of the form makes...
...it wish to do so, to require an air traffic controller to take an annual holiday. [10] The Court has power to order a stay of the Authority’s determination.5 The overarching consideration is whether granting a stay will be in the interests of justice. That decision is informed by factors such as:6 (a) Whether the challenge will be rendered ineffectual if the stay is not granted. (b) Whether the challenge is brought and pursued in good faith. (c) Whether the successful party...
...the factual matrices to warrant consolidation, there remain factual distinctions between the two claims which will likely require additional evidence to be led in respect of the Privacy Act proceeding. Mr Greenslade’s additional evidence in that matter is likely to be brief. [10] The joint memorandum further records Mr Greenslade is aware the variation in legal representation between the Human Rights Act and Privacy Act claims poses practical difficulties. The process outlined above...
BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2014] NZIACDT 107 Reference No: IACDT 10/13 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar BETWEEN Chandra Kanta Complainant AND Richard Uday Prakash Adviser DECISION IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS REPRESENTATION: Regis...
CAISTEAL AN IME LIMITED v A LABOUR INSPECTOR [2022] NZEmpC 212 [29 November 2022] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2022] NZEmpC 212 EMPC 356/2022 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for a stay of execution BETWEEN CAISTEAL AN IME LIMITED Plaintiff AND A LABOUR INSPECTOR Defend...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ENV-2020-AKL-000084 AUCKLAND REGISTRY I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal under clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Act against the decision of the Waikato Regional Council on Proposed Plan Change 1 to the Waikato Regional Plan BETWEEN FONTERRA CO-OPERATIVE GROUP LTD Appellant AND WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent NO...
...does not include all of the twists and turns that have occurred over the years since the plan to subdivide the land was envisaged as far back as 2002 but is sufficient for the purposes of this decision. Review [9] Mr HM’s involvement with this matter commenced in 2014 when Ms CB’s brother sought an opinion on issues arising from the proposed subdivision. Mr HM canvassed the possibilities of an action in damages against various parties. However, he was cautious about the like...