Search Results

Search results for justice matters.

8016 items matching your search terms

  1. LQ & QQ v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 463 (30 November 2023) [pdf, 196 KB]

    ...decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised...

  2. K Ltd v SG [2023] NZDT 211 (23 May 2023) [pdf, 92 KB]

    ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

  3. LZ v I Ltd [2023] NZDT 174 (22 May 2023) [pdf, 178 KB]

    ...decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised...

  4. HN v CN [2024] NZDT 20 (22 January 2024) [pdf, 203 KB]

    ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

  5. E Ltd v O Ltd [2023] NZDT 721 (1 December 2023) [pdf, 92 KB]

    ...not developed darker shades of green that H4 timber would do on weathering. 9. A sample of the timber was sent for testing, the results were a finding that the sample did not meet the H4 standard. After contacting the respondent to resolve the matter which would have included replacing the affected Timber, no resolution was found. 10. On all the evidence presented before me, I am satisfied that there has been a breach of the contract. OE believed he was being supplied with H4 trea...

  6. X Ltd v K Ltd [2023] NZDT 284 (25 July 2023) [pdf, 93 KB]

    ...decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised...

  7. O Ltd v MX & V Ltd [2023] NZDT 325 (20 July 2023) [pdf, 173 KB]

    ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

  8. BI & SI v BA [2023] NZDT 142 (2 May 2023) [pdf, 154 KB]

    ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

  9. CU & LU v QD Ltd [2024] NZDT 660 (21 August 2024) [pdf, 186 KB]

    ...door that pools water and drain holes for condensation at the bottom of a ranch slider have been blocked by concrete. 4. Ms D, a director of QD Limited, told the Tribunal the colour of the concrete was unacceptable. She states she discussed the matter with the concrete supplier and was recommended to do an acid etch which was done and was not successful. She states she has subsequently discovered the concrete supplier had, unbeknownst to her, changed its colouring product to an inferior...

  10. DX v CT [2024] NZDT 834 (8 October 2024) [pdf, 93 KB]

    ...decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised...