Search Results

1. NE v RL LCRO 88/2013 (27 February 2015) [pdf, 82 KB]

   ...note from materials provided by Mr NE2 [4] Mr NE says he dealt mostly with Ms RL. He is critical of her interpersonal skills, says she did not act in his best interests, did not communicate well and lacked the necessary expertise to handle his matter. He says she appeared to be unprepared at meetings, had not come to grips with the evidence and handled discovery incompetently. He says she failed to review the contents of a CD he had provided, and that the other party disclosed med...

2. [2015] NZEmpC 38 Davis v Commissioner of Police [pdf, 109 KB]

   STEPHEN DAVIS v THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 38 [30 March 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 38 EMPC 238/2014 IN THE MATTER OF an application for a rehearing BETWEEN STEPHEN DAVIS Applicant AND THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE Respondent Hearing: 19 March 2015 (heard at Christchurch) Appearances: S Davis, in person E Child and R Groot, counsel for the respondent Judgmen...

3. LA Provider Manual Part 1 Approvals - December 2018 [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ............................................................................................................... 27 Assessment by a Selection Committee ......................................................................................................... 28 Assessment by the Secretary for Justice ....................................................................................................... 30 Application outcome ........................................................................

4. Chief-Coroners-Annual-Report-2021-22-and-2022-23.pdf [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...From a Coroner’s Perspective ........................................................................................ 7 From a Coroner’s Perspective…continued ..................................................................... 8 Manager Justice Services ..................................................................................................10 The Duty Coroner stage .....................................................................................................11...

5. LCRO 148/2020 PV v GY (31 May 2021) [pdf, 269 KB]

   ...thinking when he took himself to the police station. The police had to take him to the hospital to get checked. He is still in quite a lot of pain and has some pretty bad scrapes and bruises as well. 3 [13] On [date] 2019, Mr RS’s driving matters were set down for hearing in the District Court. Ms CB was present at court to support her partner. Ms PV made a file note recording the matters that were discussed in a meeting with her client at court. The file note records that...

6. LCRO 230/2015 ZM v LG [pdf, 123 KB]

   ...overlap with the applications. [14] Mr ZM did not appear at the scheduled hearing. [15] I determined, despite Mr ZM’s non-appearance, that each of the review applications should be dealt with. [16] Because of the significant overlap in the matters engaged by the individual reviews, I have, in delivering the four decisions, replicated where appropriate, significant parts of my decision. [17] At the nub of the complaints brought against the practitioners, was argument that the...

7. 2022-03-10-Recusal-reasons-decision.pdf [pdf, 144 KB]

   ...COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH (IN-CHAMBERS) CSU-2019-CCH-000165 to CSU-2019-CCH 000214; CSU-2019-CCH-000326 I TE KŌTI KAITIROTIRO MATEWHAWHATI KI TE ŌTAUTAHI [I TE TARI] UNDER THE CORONERS ACT 2006 AND IN THE MATTER OF Inquiries into the deaths of 51 people in relation to the 15 March 2019 Christchurch Masjid Attacks Date of Minute: 10 March 2022 REASONS OF CORONER B WINDLEY AS TO APPLCATIONS FOR RECUSAL AS CORONER Introduction...

8. LCRO 184/2015 WD v YR (6 July 2017) [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...[1] Mr WD has applied for a review of the decision by [City] Standards Committee [X] to take no further action in respect of his complaints about Mr YR. Mr YR is a barrister. Background [2] In July 2013 Mr WD asked Mr YR to act in respect of matters arising out of disputes Mr WD and his wife were having with the landlord of their business premises. Mr KG of ABC Law was acting for Mr WD at that time, and agreed to remain as solicitor on the record. [3] On 25 March 2014, after...

9. QW v RH LCRO 166/2012 (18 October 2016) [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...interests were under some financial pressure. It later emerged that around the time he conceded his interests in BN’s estate he was assisted in his negotiations with Mr RH by Mr ZA. Mr ZA was initially a barrister who represented Company 2 in various matters, and later became a director of Company 2 at Mr QW’s request.2 [19] Mr QW says Mr RH has not given effect to the terms of an agreement reached between the trustees and some members of the family, and suggests Mr RH concluded ag...

10. [2024] NZEmpC 212 Kavallaris v Inframax Construction Ltd [pdf, 295 KB]

    ...regard to the object of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act).3 The Court must consider:4 (a) whether there is a serious question to be tried; (b) where the balance of convenience lies; and (c) what is required in the overall interests of justice. [35] The first question has a relatively low threshold.5 Establishing if there is a serious question to be tried has two parts:6 (a) whether there is a serious question to be tried in relation to the claim of unjustifiable dism...