Search Results

1. [2012] NZEmpC 33 Cruickshank v CE of Unitec Institute of Technology [pdf, 57 KB]

   GARRY WAYNE CRUICKSHANK V THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF UNITEC INSITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY NZEmpC AK [2012] NZEmpC 33 [27 February 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2012] NZEmpC 33 ARC 108/09 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to adduce further evidence BETWEEN GARRY WAYNE CRUICKSHANK Plaintiff AND THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF UNITEC INSITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Defen...

2. BORA Ngāti Manuhiri Claims Settlement Bill [pdf, 286 KB]

   ...than in respect of the interpretation and implementation of the deed of settlement or the Act. 7. Legislative determination of a claim would not conventionally fall within the scope of judicial review [3]. However, to the extent that any excluded matters could be susceptible to judicial review, cl 14 constitutes a justified limit on the right affirmed by s 27(2) of the Bill of Rights Act [4]. Excluding subsequent challenge is a legitimate incident of the negotiated settlement of claims...

3. N v CAC 10058 [2012] NZREADT 18 [pdf, 121 KB]

   Decision No: [2012] NZ READT 18 Reference No: READT 036/11 IN THE MATTER OF of a charge laid under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008s BETWEEN REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 10058) Appellant AND MS N Defendant BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Ms K Davenport - Chairperson Mr G Denley - Member Ms J Robson - Member APPEARANCES M J Hodge, counsel for the Authority No appearance for the defendant [...

4. CAC10056 v Ferguson [2013] NZREADT 30 [pdf, 22 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2013] NZREADT 30 READT 023/12 IN THE MATTER OF charges laid under s.91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 10056) Prosecutor AND MARK CHARLES FERGUSON Defendant MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Ms J Robson - Member Mr J Gaukrodger - Member SUBSTANTIVE DECISION ON GUILT ISSUED 22 January 2013 as [2013] NZREADT 5 DATE OF THIS DECI...

5. Chief-Commissioner-Position-Profile-1 [doc, 75 KB]

   POSITION PROFILE CHIEF COMMISSIONER Title: Chief Commissioner Appointed by: Governor-General on the advice of the Minister of Justice Time commitment: Full-Time Term: Up to 5 years Salary: As determined by the Remuneration Authority Location: The preferred location of the Chief Commissioner position is Auckland or Wellington ______________________________________________________________________ This position description is based on legislative provisions contained in the Human Rights Act...

6. BORA Nga Rohe Moana o Nga Hapu o Ngati Porou Bill [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...Customary Rights and Customary Rights Orders 9. Section 27(2) has been held to apply to a determination by a Tribunal or public authority that is adjudicative in nature [1]. A negotiated settlement between two parties is not an adjudication of the matters in dispute. Nor can it be said the Crown is a tribunal or public authority. It follows that s 27(2) is not engaged. Section 19 – Freedom From Discrimination 10. Section 19 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 concerns the ri...

7. [2023] NZEmpC 82 Lai v Gray [pdf, 161 KB]

   MATTHEW LAI v DAVID GRAY [2023] NZEmpC 82 [6 June 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2023] NZEmpC 82 EMPC 394/2022 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for security for costs BETWEEN MATTHEW LAI Plaintiff AND DAVID GRAY Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appear...

8. Adams v Aucamp [2016] NZIACDT 53 (14 September 2016) [pdf, 210 KB]

   BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2016] NZIACDT 53 Reference No: IACDT 052/14 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar BETWEEN Natalie Francine Adams Complainant AND Martinus Philippus (Martin) Aucamp Adviser DECISION (SANCTIONS) REPRESENTATION:...

9. [2023] NZEmpC 24 Pact Group v Robinson [pdf, 179 KB]

   PACT GROUP v CAREY ROBINSON [2023] NZEmpC 24 [23 February 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZEmpC 24 EMPC 428/2022 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for a stay of execution BETWEEN PACT GROUP Plaintiff AND CAREY ROBINSON Defendant Hearing: On the papers Ap...

10. BORA Ngaa Rauru Kiitahi Claims Settlement Bill [pdf, 79 KB]

    ...have an "adjudicative connotation" (in Chisholm v Auckland City Council, CA 326/02, 29 November 2002 at para 32). I do not believe a negotiated settlement between two parties can be considered to be an "adjudication" of the matters in dispute. Negotiation and adjudication are quite distinct concepts. Secondly, the determination needs to be by a tribunal like body for the section to apply (Chisholm supra). The Crown is not such a body. 8. Even if the ouster clause...