8579 items matching your search terms
...MAHARAJA INDIA LIMITED v SUBHASH CHANDER RAIZADA [2020] NZEmpC 29 [12 March 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2020] NZEmpC 29 EMPC 297/2019 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for strike out of proceedings BETWEEN MAHARAJA INDIA LIMITED First Plaintiff AND S...
CODY JOYCE v ULTIMATE SITEWORKS LIMITED [2023] NZEmpC 85 [9 June 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2023] NZEmpC 85 EMPC 43/2023 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for security for costs BETWEEN CODY JOYCE Plaintiff AND ULTIMATE SITEWORKS LIMITED Defendant Hear...
CHECKMATE PRECISION CUTTING TOOLS LIMITED v MAPU TOMO NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 107 [13 June 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 107 ARC 85/11 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN CHECKMATE PRECISION CUTTING TOOLS LIMITED Plaintiff AND MAPU TOMO Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions...
...Tauranga Moana Iwi Collective settlement deed, the Bill or the Tauranga Moana Iwi Collective Settlement Bill. 5. Legislative determinations ought not conventionally to fall within the scope of judicial review. [1] However to the extent any excluded matters could be susceptible to judicial review, cl 15 constitutes a justified limit under s 5 of the right affirmed by s 27(2). Excluding subsequent challenges is a legitimate incident of the negotiated settlement of claims. To the extent exc...
...the interpretation or implementation of the Deed of Settlement or the Te Atiawa Claims Settlement Act. 5. Legislative determination ought not conventionally to fall within the scope of judicial review. [2] However, to the extent that any excluded matters could be susceptible to judicial review, cl 14 constitutes a justified limit under s 5 of the Bill of Rights Act on the right affirmed by s 27(2). Excluding subsequent challenge is a legitimate incident of the negotiated settlement of...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I MUA I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Kl 6TAUTAHI IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 216 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal under clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Act WYUNA PRESERVE RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED (ENV-2018-CHC-143) Appellant QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan (Sitting alone under s279 of the Act) Hearing: In Chambers a...
BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2015] NZIACDT 109 Reference No: IACDT 019/14 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar BETWEEN N G and N M N Complainant AND Ueite (Itaotemai) Letalu Adviser THE NAME AND ANY INFORMATION IDENTIFYING THE COMPLAINANT IS NOT TO BE PUBLISHE...
...its investigation was to undertake a step by step analysis of what it had identified as the four key components of Mr EL’s complaint. [30] In my view, the first question to be considered, is the issue as to whether the concerns Mr EL raises are matters that properly fall to be addressed through the lawyers’ disciplinary processes. [31] Having given careful consideration to all of the information provided by Mr EL, I am strongly persuaded that Mr EL’s conduct complaint is, in...
...Committee took the view that Mr AP was entitled to act on Mr AQ’s instructions, and decided to take no further action pursuant to s 138(2) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act. [6] Mr VU sought a review because he felt that the core issue of the matter had not been looked at. His complaint was that Mr AP had acted on behalf of himself and his wife without their authority or knowledge, and there was also the concern that Mr AP had breached Rule 11.1 of the Rules of Conduct and Cl...
1 Specialist Report Writers submissions to the Minister Of Justice review of the Family Court and to the NZ Psychologists’ Board (31 August 2018) Introduction: The situation with specialist report writers (SRW) is at crisis, with fewer than 100 (many being part-time) to service all of New Zealand and with more and more work coming our way (both more and more complicated work). The outcome will be vulnerable children, the Courts’ clients and perhaps vulnerable women/ fa...