8566 items matching your search terms
BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2015] NZIACDT 98 Reference No: IACDT 013/14 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar BETWEEN Shiv Prashant Choudhary Complainant AND Gregory Francisco Smith Adviser DECISION (IMPOSING SANCTIONS) REPRESENTATION: Reg...
BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2015] NZIACDT 97 Reference No: IACDT 010/14 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar BETWEEN Tania Hayley Allen Complainant AND Gregory Francisco Smith Adviser DECISION (IMPOSING SANCTIONS) REPRESENTATION: Registra...
...of Auckland Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Background [1] Mr Tranent complained to the New Zealand Law Society regarding the conduct of Mr Abingdon. The matter was referred to the Auckland Standards Committee 4 for consideration. Mr Abingdon acts for Mr Tranent‟s estranged wife (Ms XX) in respect of certain relationship property matters. [2] On 24 February 2009 the Auckland Standards Com...
...“character” aspect of the fit and proper person test or that he lacks “skill and competence” when that is considered against the lengthy period when he practised on his own account prior to his bankruptcy. 5 [10] As a preliminary matter both Counsel have addressed the question of the Tribunal’s jurisdiction to hear and determine this appeal. That arises because in its decision in Mason1 the Tribunal, by way of addendum, held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear...
AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED v GRANT KERR NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 141 [26 July 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 141 ARC 38/13 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for further disclosure, an application for leave to extend time to file briefs in reply, an application for leave to file an amended statement of claim BETWEEN AIR NEW ZEALAND LIM...
...were not correct. [17] The report identified and discussed other areas of non-compliance. The “own motion” investigation [18] The report was considered by the Committee which resolved to instigate an “own motion” investigation into the matters raised in the report and Ms [CL] was requested to comment on these.6 Ms [CL] engaged Mr MD to assist and advise her. [19] Mr MD advised the Committee that Mr DN had been engaged to assist the investigation and that “real progres...
BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2015] NZIACDT 100 Reference No: IACDT 037/14 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar BETWEEN Lenice Mandy February Complainant AND Gregory Francisco Smith Adviser DECISION (IMPOSING SANCTIONS) REPRESENTATION: Regi...
...brought and defended the proceeding, and whether steps taken in it were reasonable. For example, a governmental or third party decision may have intervened, rendering the proceeding redundant. But this is merely to recognise that the interests of justice occasionally may require that such matters be taken into account. It is not to invite a general inquiry into the reasonableness of the parties’ conduct. [23] Third, and consistent with what we have just said, a plaintiff may no...
...address. [3] On or about 12 October 2011, Mrs AV was arrested and charged with further offences. Mrs AV was committed for trial in the High Court, due to commence in April 2012. On 18 October 2011 Mr AU was instructed by the Legal Aid Ministry of Justice (LAMJ) to also act for Mrs AV in relation to the fresh charges. 2 [4] In October 2011 Mr WC spoke by telephone with Mrs AV (Mr AU says there was a meeting but this is not material) whilst she was in custody at the Women’s...
...EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS v JCE [2019] NZEmpC 195 [19 December 2019] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2019] NZEmpC 195 EMPC 315/2018 IN THE MATTER OF of a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application to strike out proceeding BETWEEN THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Plaintiff...