8566 items matching your search terms
RODERICK JOHN YOUNG v BAY OF PLENTY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 235 [11 December 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 235 ARC 34/11 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of interlocutory applications BETWEEN RODERICK JOHN YOUNG Plaintiff AND BAY OF PLENTY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD Defendant Hearing: 14 November 2013...
...Waitangi Tribunal Level 7, Fujitsu Tower 141 The Terrace Wellington New Zealand DX SX11237 Tel : 64 4 914 3000 Fax : 64 4 914 3001 www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Te Manutukutuku is produced and published by the Waitangi Tribunal Unit of the Ministry of Justice, and every effort has been made to ensure that it is true and correct at the date of publication. I n April 2015, Chief Judge Wilson Isaac, chairperson of the Waitangi Tribunal, released a memorandum to all claimants and the Crow...
· Te Roopu Whakamana i te Tiriti 0 Waitangi Panui Waitangi Tribunal Division Department of Justice Newsletter TOFU tekau Whiringa a Hangi 1994 Number 30 November 1994 ISSN 0114·717X Court confirms Tribunal finding A High Court decision on the Maori Option exercise has largely confirmed a Waitangi Tribunal finding that more fund· ing should have been made available to inform Maori about their electoral choices THE HIGH COURT decision said that Maori were "significan...
Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 7 April 2025 Ref: OIA 119799 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Crimes Act reform and citizen’s arrest Thank you for your email of 26 February 2025, requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information regarding proposed reforms to the Crimes Act to allow greater citizen arrest powers. Specifically, y...
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2012] NZHRRT 12 Reference No. HRRT 027/2011 IN THE MATTER OF A CLAIM UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN RAZDAN RAFIQ PLAINTIFF AND COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Dr S Hickey, Member Dr A Trlin, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr Rafiq in person (no appearance) Mr E Child and Mr T Hallett-Hook for Defendant DATE OF HEARING: 11 A...
...as follows: (1) The Tribunal erred in refusing Mr Hart’s application to adjourn the hearing of the charges, brought on the ground that he was medically unfit to attend. The decision to proceed in his absence has resulted in a miscarriage of justice. (2) The Tribunal erred in considering charge three. It was insufficiently serious for referral to the Tribunal and should have been dealt with by the Standards Committee. (3) The Tribunal should not have found the first charge pr...
...the first respondent’s application, finding that there was tenable evidence that the first respondent may have either carried out work that would render him personally liable to the claimants as a tortfeasor, or that he took actions that, as a matter of law, impose a legal responsibility to the claimants on him1. [6] The first respondent then engaged counsel and sought and was granted leave to make a second application for removal2. 1 Procedural Order 2, dated 7 May 2021...
...account in considering whether to grant interim relief include:2 a) whether there is an arguable issue to be tried; b) where the balance of convenience lies; c) whether damages are an adequate remedy for the plaintiff; and d) the overall justice of the case. [22] Because the interim application would effectively dispose of the defendant’s substantive rights to strike on the basis of a notice which is already issued, something more than a barely arguable case is required. Th...
...REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2022] NZHRRT 5 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [1] These proceedings under the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 were filed on 23 November 2021. [2] Prior to the filing of the proceedings the parties resolved all matters in issue and the Tribunal is asked to make a consent declaration. The parties have filed: [2.1] A Consent Memorandum dated 15 November 2021. [2.2] An Agreed Summary of Facts, a copy of which is annexed and marked ‘A’. [3] In th...
NEW ZEALAND PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS UNION V THE NEW ZEALAND FIRE SERVICE COMMISSON NZEmpC CHCH [2011] NZEmpC 149 [21 November 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2011] NZEmpC 149 CRC 50/10 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS UNION First Plaintiff AND ALAN CAHILL Second Plaintiff AND CRAWFORD MORRIS Third Plaintiff AND THE NEW ZEALAND FIR...