Search Results

Search results for justice matters.

8566 items matching your search terms

  1. [2025] NZREADT 06 - UX v REAA (19 February 2025) [pdf, 292 KB]

    BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2025] NZREADT 06 Reference No: READT 032/2024 IN THE MATTER OF An application for review of a Registrar’s decision under s 112 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN UX Applicant AND THE REGISTRAR OF THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY Respondent Decision on the papers Tribunal: D J Plunkett (Chair) G J Denley (Member) P N O’Connor (Member) Representation: The a

  2. Research on the effectiveness of police practice in reducing residential burglary part 9 [pdf, 145 KB]

    ...and Alison Gray December 2005 2 Research on the effectiveness of Police practice in reducing residential burglary Report 1: Surveys of Household Burglary part one (2002): Four Police Areas and national data compared, Dr Sue Triggs, Ministry of Justice, 2005. Report 2: Surveys of Household Burglary part two: Four Police Areas compared between 2002 and 2004, Dr Sue Triggs, Ministry of Justice, 2005. Report 3: Literature review: Police practice in reducing residential burglary, Dr Sally Ha...

  3. Ellison v Jones - Estate of Daniel Ellison [2021] Chief Judge's MB 150 (2021 CJ 150) [pdf, 366 KB]

    ...I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TĀKITIMU In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Tākitimu District A20180004123 CJ 2018/41 WĀHANGA Under Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Estate of Daniel Ellison I WAENGA I A Between PUKEPUKE TANGIORA ELLISON Te kaitono Applicant ME And SHELLY NGAWAI JONES Te kaiurupare Respondent Nohoanga: Hearing On the papers Whakat...

  4. LCRO 106/2022 MG v WL (30 June 2023) [pdf, 247 KB]

    ...invoices totalling $115,353.95 (excluding GST and disbursements). Ms MG terminated Ms WL’s instructions in February 2018 and instructed new counsel, Mr PV. Mr PV uplifted all files from Ms WL and shortly afterwards, Ms MG and Mr HK settled all matters between them. Ms MG’s complaints3 [6] Ms MG’s complaints were made in her personal capacity, as a director of [Company B], and as a trustee of the [M] Family Trust.4 [7] It would seem5 that, in the main, Ms MG has formed the...

  5. LCRO 145/2015 and 148/2015 YK v GS and GS v YK [pdf, 407 KB]

    ...against the members of the Committee. [13] In response, the Standards Committee advised that it considered it did not have a conflict of interest that would prevent it from performing its duties in a way that was consistent with the rules of natural justice and resolved to proceed with its inquiry.2 The letter also requested further documents from Mr YK, including his time records and a copy of his file. [14] A notice of hearing was attached to the letter from the Standards Committ...

  6. [2015] NZEmpC 192 Lim v Meadow Mushrooms Ltd [pdf, 192 KB]

    SOTHY (DAVID) LIM v MEADOW MUSHROOMS LIMITED NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 192 [4 November 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 192 EMPC 218/2015 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN SOTHY (DAVID) LIM Plaintiff AND MEADOW MUSHROOMS LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 19 October 2015 (heard at Christchurch) Appearances: G Bennett, advocate for...

  7. Hawkins v New Zealand Police [2024] NZHRRT 8 [pdf, 258 KB]

    ...3 Notice on what he says was an unsubstantiated complaint. Mr Hawkins’ focus in his questions to Police’s witness and in submissions to this Tribunal was that he is innocent of all alleged harassment. Those specific grievances are not matters in respect of which the Tribunal has jurisdiction. They are not relevant to the narrow PA 2020 issues before us. We make no comment on the merits of those grievances. [10] At the hearing of the claim the Tribunal made an interim no...

  8. LCRO 76/2024 QM v BY (13 December 2024) [pdf, 240 KB]

    ...Standards Committee or a Review Officer is $25,000.00.5 [35] QM attached to her review application her 12 June 2024 letter to the New Zealand Law Society and the material that she had submitted with that letter. Fresh issue [36] QM raises a further matter in her review application, and it was not one which she had included in her complaint to the Complaints Service. She said the following: I would also like you to consider the matter regarding [BY’s] advice to me to move out of o...

  9. Evaluation of Family Safety Teams pilot: stage 1 [pdf, 3 MB]

    Family Safety Teams Pilot Evaluation: Stage One Baseline Study and Formative Evaluation A report prepared for the Ministry of Justice by Robyn Dixon & Deborah Widdowson Centre for Child and Family Policy Research Janet Fanslow & David Thomas Social and Community Health School of Population Health University of Auckland Trish Knaggs, Latika Vasil, Esther Banbury Ministry of Justice 31 August 2006 2...