Search Results

1. [2006] NZEmpC AC 43/06 Axiom Rolle PRP Valuations Services Ltd v Kapadia [pdf, 149 KB]

   AXIOM ROLLE PRP VALUATIONS SERVICES LTD V RAHUL RAMESH KAPADIA AK AC 43/06 4 August 2006 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 43/06 ARC 79/04 IN THE MATTER OF an application by non-party for an order discharging or varying an Anton Piller order BETWEEN AXIOM ROLLE PRP VALUATIONS SERVICES LTD Plaintiff AND RAHUL RAMESH KAPADIA Defendant AND EQUITY REALTY (1995) LIMITED Non-party Intervener Hearing: 30 June, 1 and 25 July 2005 (Heard at Auckland) Co...

2. O'Hagan v Police [2020] NZHRRT 22 [pdf, 827 KB]

   ...aspects of Mr O’Hagan’s request and the considerable timespan involved. These factors made retrieval of records and contacting Police officers challenging given there was a need to speak to a number of Police personnel who had been involved in the matters which were the subject of the request. There were also resource limitations. [13] On 16 June 2015 the Police learnt by email from the Office of the Ombudsman that Mr O’Hagan had made a complaint to that Office about Police del...

3. Property-Law-Act-amendments-in-the-COVID-19-Response-Management-Measures-Legislation-Bill.pdf [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   I N C O N F I D E N C E 1 I N C O N F I D E N C E In Confidence Office of the Minister of Justice COVID-19 Ministerial Group COVID-19: Options to resolve commercial lease disputes Proposal 1 This paper provides options for resolving commercial lease disputes in the context of the current COVID-19 Alert Level restrictions. Relation to government priorities 2 This paper relates to the Government’s overarching priority of a COVID-19 recovery plan for all New Ze...

4. CARROLL v Coroners Court at Auckland (2013 NZHC 906) [pdf, 304 KB]

   ...give the applicants prior notice of his intention to comment adversely upon their conduct and an opportunity to be heard in relation to that comment. Finally, they say that the finding was otherwise made in breach of the principles of natural justice because the applicants had no notice that their conduct was likely to be the subject of scrutiny at the inquest. [3] The applicants seek to have the finding quashed and costs awarded in their favour. [4] Because the first responden...

5. Brown - Motatau 2 Section 23A1B [2019] Chief Judge's MB 311 (2019 CJ 311) [pdf, 339 KB]

   2019 Chief Judge’s MB 311 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20140008870 CJ 2014/20 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Motatau 2 Section 23A1B BETWEEN APERAHAMA BROWN, DIANA BROWN, JANIE BROWN, JULIE BROWN, PRISCILLA BROWN AND TED BROWN AS TRUSTEES OF THE HEKE BROWN WHĀNAU TRUST Applicants Hearing: 11 December 2018, 2018 Chief Judge’s MB 1044-1061 (Hea...

6. Hita v Hita - Kaihu 1A2E3B2 [2021] Chief Judge's MB 1233 (2021 CJ 1233) [pdf, 543 KB]

   ...KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TE TAITOKERAU In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Taitokerau District A20200007363 CJ 2020/25 WĀHANGA Under Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Kaihu 1A2E3B2 I WAENGA I A Between JOSHUA BENJAMIN HITA Te kaitono Applicant ME And DASON HITA Te kaiurupare Respondent Nohoanga: Hearing 19 July 2021, 2021 Chief Judge’s MB 1062-108...

7. Slade - Parengarenga 3G (2014) 87 Taitokerau MB 46 (87 TTK 46) [pdf, 121 KB]

   87 Taitokerau MB 46 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20130006016 UNDER Section 238, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Parengarenga 3G BETWEEN RIA EDWINA SLADE Applicant Hearing: 20 November 2013 4 August 2014 11 September 2014 (Heard at Kaitaia and Whangarei) Appearances: Peter Andrew, counsel for the Trust Judgment: 12 September 2014 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE D J AMB...

8. Te Awe Awe v Te Awe Awe - Estate of Pipi Rakene or Pipi Te Awe Awe (2019) Chief Judge's MB 1414 (2019 CJ 1414) [pdf, 258 KB]

   2019 Chief Judge’s MB 1414 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20150004101 CJ 2015/19 UNDER Section 45 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Pipi Rakena or Pipi Te Awe Awe and a succession order made at 81 Otaki MB 265-266 on 6 November 1978 BETWEEN WIREMU KINGI TE AWE AWE and RANGI KAPIKI TE AWE AWE Applicants AND WIREMU TIPI TE AWE AWE Respondent Hearing: 6 November 2019, 2019 Chief Judge’s MB 1224-1244 (He...

9. [2021] NZEmpC 142 Christieson v Fonterra Co-Operative Group Ltd [pdf, 266 KB]

   ...CHRISTIESON v FONTERRA CO-OPERATIVE GROUP LIMITED [2021] NZEmpC 142 [26 August 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 142 EMPC 177/2021 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN DEREK JOHN CHRISTIESON Plaintiff AND FONTERRA CO-OPERATIVE GROUP LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 28 July 2021 (Heard at...

10. Wood v Accident Compensation Corporation [2015] NZACA 6 [pdf, 185 KB]

    ...paid is known, details as to how it was arrived at are not known. 2 [4] Another unusual feature of the application made to the Authority is that in the intervening period, Mr Wood had actively pursued through the courts the very matter on which he now seeks to re-litigate, being ERC in the period following the accident. [5] In 2009, some 21 years after the review decision is assumed to have been made, Mr Wood mounted this application seeking leave to appeal. The es...