Search Results

1. [2021] NZEnvC 037 Ngai Tamahaua Hapu Committee v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga [pdf, 782 KB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KITAMAKIMAKAURAU IN THE MATTER OF AND OF BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2021] NZEnvC 037 the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 an application for waivers under s 281 of the Resource Management Act 1991 to file three appeals out of time NGAI TAMAHAUA HAPU COMMITTEE (ENV-2020-AKL-000193) Appellant HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE TAONGA Respondent OPOTIKI DISTRICT COUNCIL Applicant Befo...

2. Reedy - Waitangi A1A2 (2003) 65 Ruatōria MB 168 (65 RUA 168) [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...Wickliffe KW. Lardelli, Clerk of the Court 12 May 2003 Application No: A20020002622 Subject: Sections: Counsel: Waitangi A1A2 & Other Blocks 238/93 Mr Bunbury DECISION Application and Issues Minute Book: 65 RUA 168 This matter concerns an application filed by Mr Manana Kaua Terangi Reedy under section 239/93 for the replacement of Trustees. That application was filed in April 2002. After considering the grounds for bringing the application, I directed that the a...

3. Mangu v Trustees of Te Runanga a Iwi o Ngapuhi [2019] Chief Judge's MB 1449 (2019 CJ 1449) [pdf, 164 KB]

   2019 Chief Judge’s MB 1449 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20190011194 UNDER Rule 4.10(3) of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011 IN THE MATTER OF Te Runanga-a-Iwi o Ngāpuhi and a request for review of Registrar’s decision MERE MANGU and DOVER SAMUELS Applicants Hearing: On the papers Appearances: T Castle for the applicants Judgment: 18 December 2019 JUDGMENT OF DEPUTY CHIEF...

4. Youth Court FAQs for Professionals at Alert Level 2 [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...and pepeha may be incorporated into these hearings on request from the Youth Advocate or Lay Advocate. Q: How are cases being triaged during Level 2? Youth Court Judges continue to review and prioritise cases to ensure that any outstanding matters requiring attention are addressed as quickly as possible. This review is being conducted using information on the file, and matters affecting the liberty of young people or regarding young people in custody, continue to be hea...

5. Wall v Fairfax New Zealand Ltd (Costs) [2017] NZHRRT 28 [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...Responsibility for “respecting and ensuring” the ICCPR rights is a State obligation (Article 2(1)), as is the responsibility to enact domestic legislation which is both clear and without ambiguity. [9] There is also the principle of access to justice as recognised in Andrews at [57]. It is a principle of some significance in the costs context. It is particularly important that the 3 Tribunal recognise that the risk of having to pay the legal costs of the opposing side (or...

6. GM v TT LCRO 31 / 2011 (24 November 2011) [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...Court did not approve the entire amount claimed by the winning party does not give rise to disciplinary issues against the lawyer who prepared the Memorandum. I am unable to find any basis for criticising the Practitioner in relation to these matters. Alleged error on part of Standards Committee concerning Applicant’s standing [14] The Applicant complained to the NZLS alleging excessive charges by the Practitioner. He relied on Rule 9 of the Rules of Conduct and Client Care wh...

7. Hristovski v Accident Compensation Corporation (Jurisdiction) [2023] NZACC 100 [pdf, 203 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 100 ACR 51/22 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162(1) OF THE ACT BETWEEN MARJAN HRISTOVSKI Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Submissions: The Appellant is self-represented T Gee for the Respondent Hearing: On the papers Judgment: 27 Ju...

8. [2010] NZEmpC 48 DAS Transport Ltd v Kirkwood [pdf, 26 KB]

   DAS TRANSPORT LTD V KIRKWOOD WN 30 April 2010 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2010] NZEMPC 48 WRC 3/10 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to challenge out of time BETWEEN DAS TRANSPORT LIMITED Intending Plaintiff AND HAYDEN KIRKWOOD Intended Defendant Hearing: 30 April 2010 (by telephone conference call) (Heard at Wellington) Appearances: John Gwilliam, Counsel for Intending Plaintiff Leo Watson, Counsel for Intended Defendant Judgment:...

9. Koha v Tatana - Succession to Winika Hāwe [2022] Chief Judge's MB 266 (2022 CJ 266) [pdf, 359 KB]

   ...KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TE TAITOKERAU In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Taitokerau District A20100008211 CJ 2010/84 WĀHANGA Under Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Winika Hāwe I WAENGA I A Between RAELENE KOHA AND KATHRYN WHEELER Ngā kaitono Applicants ME And CECILIA TATANA Te Kaiurupare Respondent Nohoanga: Hearing 29 July 2021, 2021 Chief Judge...

10. McAsey and Gill v Wellington 356 Committee APPEAL [2011] NZLCDT 41 [pdf, 216 KB]

    BEFORE THE NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2011] NZLCDT 41 LCDT 006/011 and 007/011 UNDER the Law Practitioners Act 1982 and the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of appeals against decisions of the Wellington Lawyers Standards Committee established by the New Zealand Law Society under Section 357 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN GAIL DAWN McASEY of Wellington, Barrister and Solicitor First Appellant...