Search Results

1. 2019 Directory of Official Information A-C [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...A-C Author Version number Date About This is a living document; we endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email official.correspondence@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments –we can send you a MS Word version if you need. official.correspondence@justice.govt.nz Ministerial Services Strategy, Governance & Finance mailto:official.correspondence@justice.go...

2. [2022] NZEnvC 258 Southland District Council v Chartres [pdf, 279 KB]

   SDC v CHARTRES – COSTS DECISION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2022] NZEnvC 258 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an application for enforcement orders under s314 and s316 of the Act BETWEEN SOUTHLAND DISTRICT COUNCIL (ENV-2020-CHC-109) Applicant AND PETER DONALD CHARTRES AND CP TRUSTEES LIMITED Respondents Court: Environment Judge P A Steven Hearing: In Chambers at Christchurch...

3. 2020-12-07 Statement of evidence of Tom de Pelsemaeker on behalf of the ORC - Appendix H [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...when exercising powers and functions under the RMA in relation to the use, development and protection of natural and physical resources. The obligation to “take into account” is a requirement to weigh the principles of the Treaty with all other matters being considered and, in coming to a decision, effect a balance between the principles and all other matters.2 However, the principles do not necessarily prevail over the other matters that local authorities must “recognise and provi...

4. DS v WH LCRO 163 / 2010 (16 August 2011) [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...DS’s assertion that Mr WH had breached Rule 13.4 [this should be a reference to Rule 13.5.4]. 2. Mr WH’s submissions had an evidential foundation and a clear factual basis. 3. The complaint appeared to be an attempt by Mr DS to re-litigate the matter. [7] The Applicant has applied for a review of that decision and asserts that there is no evidential foundation to support the submission made to the Court. He requested that the matter be properly and honestly investigated and th...

5. Naera v Fenwick - Whakapoungakau 24 Block (2010) 11 Waiariki MB 191 (11 WAR 191) [pdf, 122 KB]

   ...JILLIAN NAERA MLC A20090014063 30 June 2010 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT 11 WAIARIKI MB 191 (11 WAR 191) A20090014063 UNDER Sections 19, 67, 231, 239 and 240, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Whakapoungakau 24 Block BETWEEN JILLIAN NAERA, ERIC HODGE, WARWICK MOREHU, ANAHA MOREHU, BUNNY ORMSBY Applicant AND PIRIHIRA FENWICK, WIREMU KINGI, WINNIER EMERY AND HIWINUI HEKE First Respondents AND TAI ERU S...

6. LCRO 112/2019 EQ v XD (30 July 2021) [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...of the freeholding. [7] Complaint was also made against Mr EQ’s partner, Mr FT. No conduct finding was made against Mr FT, and Ms XD took no steps to review that aspect of the Committee’s decision. This review then is focused solely on the matters of complaint engaging Mr EQ, and more specifically, the conduct complaint that the Committee had upheld which had resulted in the finding that Mr EQ’s conduct had been unsatisfactory. [8] The Standards Committee delivered its decis...

7. Chief Registrar - Matauri X Incorporation [2005] Chief Judge's MB 276 (2005 CJ 276) [pdf, 962 KB]

   ...opportunity to l11ake submissions on the questions the subject of this application. I do not see any point in seeking his submissions. It would be unusual in the ordinary course of events to do so where he has not taken any positive steps himself in the matter. The Registrar's view is not generally sought on s98 applications and there is no particular reason to seek it in this case. lYfr Fitzpatrick also sought to file "further submissions to enable the making of final submi...

8. Auckland Standards Committee 4 v Kennelly [2022] NZLCDT 31 (1 September 2022) [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...CLIENTS NOT TO BE PUBLISHED AS PER THE ORDER RECORDED AT PARAGRAPH [41], PURSUANT TO S 240 OF THE LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS ACT 2006. NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2022] NZLCDT 31 LCDT 028/21 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 4 Applicant AND PATRICK KENNELLY Respondent DEPUTY CHAIR Dr J G Adams MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr S Hunter QC Ms K Kin...

9. [2016] NZEmpC 112 Radius Residential Care Ltd v The NZ Nurses Organisation Inc [pdf, 431 KB]

   RADIUS RESIDENTIAL CARE LIMITED v THE NEW ZEALAND NURSES ORGANISATION INC NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 112 [31 August 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 112 EMPC 265/2015 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN RADIUS RESIDENTIAL CARE LIMITED Plaintiff AND THE NEW ZEALAND NURSES ORGANISATION INC First Defendant AND E TU INC (FORMERLY THE SERVICE & FOOD WOR...

10. Status hearings evaluation: New Zealand study of pre-trial hearings in criminal cases [pdf, 487 KB]

    Status Hearings Evaluation: A New Zealand Study of Pre-trial Hearings in Criminal Cases Wendy Searle Tania Slater Trish Knaggs Janet November Christopher Clark ii First published in July 2004 by the Ministry of Justice and Law Commission PO Box 180 Wellington New Zealand ISBN 0-478-20188-5 iii Foreword Status hearings were introduced on the initiative of judges in the Auckland District Court in 1995, as a type of pre-trial conference. They aimed to avoid the inefficiencies crea...