Search Results

1. [2011] NZEmpC 124 Amien v Reipen and Others interlocutory [pdf, 69 KB]

   AMIEN, OF SAN DIEGO, USA V KARL HEINZ REIPEN NZEmpC WN [2011] NZEmpC 124 [5 October 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2011] NZEmpC 124 WRC 27/11 IN THE MATTER OF an application for a freezing order and an ancillary order BETWEEN JAIME MELGAREJO AMIEN, OF SAN DIEGO, USA Applicant AND KARL HEINZ REIPEN First Respondent AND AWAKINO FORTUNE LTD Second Respondent AND BAILEY INGHAM LTD Third Respondent Hearing: (on the papers)...

2. TS v CT Ltd [2019] NZDT 1377 (25 July 2019) [pdf, 236 KB]

   ...allow a $500 portion of this cost for the wiring of the cabin itself as consequential loss. 15. The $402.50 cost of the independent building report is also a consequential loss and it was obtained during initial attempts to have CTL address the matter, well before the lodging of the Tribunal proceedings, so is not excluded by section 43 of the Disputes Tribunal Act's bar on award of costs related to proceedings. 16. Storage costs of $294.70 for Ms S's belongings are als...

3. Equal Pay Amendment Bill [pdf, 303 KB]

   ...rationally connected with the objective? ii. Does the limit impair the right or freedom no more than is reasonably necessary for sufficient achievement of the objective? iii. Is the limit in due proportion to the importance of the objective?7 Ministry of Justice, Consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990: Employment (Pay Equity and Equal Pay) Bill, 13 March 2018; and Consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990: Employment (Pay Equity and Equal Pay) Bill 2017...

4. Human Rights Act 1993

   ...ss 17 and 18 Mullane v Attorney-General (Request for Documents) [2020] NZHRRT 14 Access to Tribunal file – complaint referred back to Human Rights Commission for mediation – statutory attachment of confidentiality to mediation – effect on open justice principle and on media access to Tribunal file during mediation process – Human Rights Act 1993, ss 75, 83, 85, 86, 87, 92D and 107(1) – High Court Rules, Part 3, Subpart 2, rr 3.13 and 3.16 Tan v Chief Executive, Ministry of Social D...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Human rights >
   3. Decisions - Index

5. Central Standards Committee 3 v Sawyer [2022] NZLCDT 38 (28 October 2022) [pdf, 222 KB]

   SOME NAMES PERMANENTLY SUPPRESSED AS RECORDED IN PARAGRAPH [53], PURSUANT TO S 240 OF THE LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS ACT 2006. NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2022] NZLCDT 38 LCDT 002/22 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN CENTRAL STANDARDS COMMITTEE 3 Applicant AND CAROLINE ANN SAWYER Respondent DEPUTY CHAIR Dr J G Adams MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Ms N Coates Ms J Gray Mr K Raure...

6. NP v KT [2021] NZDT 1706 (12 October 2021) [pdf, 243 KB]

   ...of the pruning and shaping to her trees and shrubs and what she sees as a loss of privacy due to the height her hedge and other plant were cut back too. The parties clearly have different views on the standard of the work done. In considering this matter I need to look to the evidence that supports the parties’ views. 23. In terms of the loss of privacy, NP has not provided any photographs supporting that the pruned height of the hedge or the camellia have caused her a loss of priva...

7. IPT Annual Report 2014 [pdf, 3.7 MB]

   ...also records the statistics for the Tribunal as a whole. The Immigration Act 2009 imposes no reporting requirements on the Immigration and Protection Tribunal. Nevertheless, it has been the practice of the Tribunal to provide one to the Minister of Justice, the Minister of Immigration and the Minister for Courts. This is the third full annual report of the Immigration and Protection Tribunal and covers the 12 months from 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014. The last full annual report was publis...

8. IQ & WK v HK [2024] NZDT 134 (10 April 2024) [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...and IQ for the payment of the improvement costs, and an order of $2,720 against WK, which remains unpaid. 6. WK and IQ requested a rehearing of the improvement costs decision which was granted. 7. Referee Wilson reheard the improvement costs matter. He found that there was no legally binding contract between the parties for the improvement costs claimed by HK, nor was there any other legal basis to reimburse the improvement costs. The improvement costs claimed were for a dishwash...

9. BE v W Ltd & KN [2024] NZDT 885 (15 December 2024) [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...Court. The total of the above costs is $42,880.50. BE claims $30,000 of that amount. BE does not claim any part of the legal costs associated with the District Court case. 10. BE, KN and CO (representing W Ltd) attended the two hearings of this matter in person at the [District Court]. Issues 11. The issues for the Tribunal to consider are: (a) Whether the Tribunal is prevented from hearing the claim by the provisions of S.11(5)(b) Disputes Tribunal Act; (b) Whether the Trib...

10. Proactive-release: Firearms-Registry-Review [pdf, 7.3 MB]

    ...that the Registry continue as planned through to 31 August 2028, but with a stronger monitoring and evaluation framework to provide more data going forward. To ensure accurate and relevant data is collected, the Review recommends that the Ministry of Justice establish a clear monitoring and evaluation framework, with oversight from the Minister’s Arms Advisory Group (MAAG). The following data should be provided to both the MAAG and Ministry of Justice, from 31 July 2025 year- on-year thr...