Search Results

1. LCRO 97/2015 SD v ET and CH (10 May 2017) [pdf, 163 KB]

   ...nor the view of Ms ET can be corroborated, it is not possible for the complaint to be resolved or taken any further. 1 (b) As trustees, Ms SD and her brother must act jointly and unanimously. However, they have been unable to agree on certain matters. Without the agreement of both trustees, Mr CH and Ms ET cannot complete administration of the estate. Ms SD has consulted her own lawyer for advice on the administration of the estate. The Standards Committee notes, however, that...

2. SW v RD LCRO 2/2012 (24 September 2015) [pdf, 62 KB]

   ...protected person in an application that he put before the Family Court on behalf of Ms CH by signing a consent dated 7 December 2010 addressed to the Presiding Judge which said: 2 I hereby consent to the making of a protection order in the matter of CH v RD (application for protection order) naming me as a protected person under any protection order under the Domestic Violence Act 1995 against the respondent RD. (the consent) [4] Mr SW explains that he had encountered dif...

3. [2022] NZEmpC 15 Alkazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd [pdf, 199 KB]

   AHMED ALKAZAZ v ENTERPRISE IT LIMITED [2022] NZEmpC 15 [8 February 2022] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2022] NZEmpC 15 EMPC 397/2019 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for recall of judgment/rehearing BETWEEN AHMED ALKAZAZ Plaintiff AND ENTERPRISE IT LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On...

4. [2018] NZEnvC 145 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   I . r X'\ ,I ~ (~llil !Ii(},\~' ~~ ..-- \ \ 'l-{l -...J 'Q I,. ~ o ' .-) /lJJ J BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC145 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of appeals pursuant to clause 14(1) of the First Schedule of the Act FEDERATED FARMERS OF NEW ZEALAND INC (ENV-2018-CHC-53) ... (continued on page 9) Appellants QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Re...

5. Deputy Registrar - Estate of Hohepa Ripia [2016] Chief Judge's MB 869 (2016 CJ 869) [pdf, 273 KB]

   2016 Chief Judge’s MB 869 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20110007018 CJ 2011/29 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Hohepa Ripia (Deceased) DEPUTY REGISTRAR Applicant Judgment: 20 October 2016 DECISION OF CHIEF JUDGE W W ISAAC 2016 Chief Judge’s MB 870 Introduction [1] This application filed by a Deputy Reg...

6. [2010] NZEmpC 45 Miller v Fonterra Co-op Group Ltd [pdf, 38 KB]

   MILLER V FONTERRA CO-OP GROUP LTD AK 27 April 2010 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2010] NZEMPC 45 ARC 45/09 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF preliminary issues BETWEEN SEAN MILLER Plaintiff AND FONTERRA CO-OPERATIVE GROUP LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 23 March 2010 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: Tony Drake, counsel for plaintiff John Rooney and Katherine Burson, counsel for defendant...

7. Bonner v Accident Compensation Corporation (Rehabilitation) [2024] NZACC 164 (15 October 2024) [pdf, 224 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 164 ACAR 57/24 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN BONNER, PHILIP Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 15 October 2024 Held at: Wellington by AVL Appearances: The Appellant is self-represented B Marten for the Accident Compensation Corporation (“the Cor...

8. WE v AW & AX LCRO 82 / 2012 (10 June 2013) [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...about Mr AW’s fees was settled during the course of the review hearing. [2] There remains some issues as to Mr AW’s conduct which need to be addressed to complete this review. Background [3] It is unnecessary to relate the facts of the matter on which Mr WE instructed Mr AW and Mr AX, as they have no bearing on the matters complained of. [4] Mr WE’s complaints (other than costs) were:- 2 (a) Mr AW did not provide the client information required by Rules 3.4 and 3.5...

9. BORA Food Bill [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...buyer. We have considered whether cl 211 limits the freedom of expression affirmed in s 14 of the Bill of Rights Act. We conclude that any limitation can be justified because cl 211 serves an important and significant objective and is restricted to matters contained in the Bill. It does not prevent a person from advertising or expressing genuinely held opinions. 5. Clause 256 of the Bill empowers the chief executive of the department responsible for administering the Act (‘the chie...

10. IG v HC LCRO 101/12 (3 June 2015) [pdf, 47 KB]

    ...to obtain her entitlement. 2 [3] Ms IG says when she first instructed Mr HC she was intent on commencing court proceedings, but that he prevailed on her to continue negotiating, and she was dissatisfied when several months later, the matter was not resolved and she was forced to commence court proceedings in England. Ms IG says Mr HC should have told her from the beginning that he could not advise her on English law, or act in court proceedings commenced in England. She...