Search Results

1. [2021] NZEmpC 214 McDonnell v The Board of Trustees of Te Manawa O Tuhoe Trust [pdf, 273 KB]

   ...THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF TE MANAWA O TŪHOE TRUST [2021] NZEmpC 214 [2 December 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 214 EMPC 335/2021 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN TANIA MCDONNELL Plaintiff AND THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF TE MANAWA O TŪHOE TRUST Defendant Hearing: 22 November 2021...

2. [2021] NZEmpC 59 Humphrey v Canterbury District Health Board [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...CANTERBURY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD, TE POARI HAUORA O WAITAHA [2021] NZEmpC 59 [30 April 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2021] NZEmpC 59 EMPC 39/2021 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for interim reinstatement BETWEEN ALISTAIR ROSS GORDON HUMPHREY Plaintiff AND CANTERBURY DISTRICT HEALTH B...

3. [2019] NZEmpC 22 Zhang v Telco Asset Management Ltd [pdf, 319 KB]

   YAN ZHANG v TELCO ASSET MANAGEMENT LIMITED [2019] NZEmpC 22 [4 March 2019] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2019] NZEmpC 22 EMPC 371/2018 IN THE MATTER OF an application to file a challenge out of time BETWEEN YAN ZHANG Applicant AND TELCO ASSET MANAGEMENT LIMITED Respondent Hearing: 14 February 2019 (Heard at Wellington) Appearances:...

4. X Ltd v II [2021] NZDT 1539 (14 May 2021) [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...GST was added to the disputed amount the amount was $13,557.80. II and BI deducted this amount from the $40,337.98 invoiced by XL and then paid the balance of $26,780.13 to XL in full satisfaction of the amount charged. [3] After considering the matters raised by II and BI XL advised them that it was not prepared to accept the amount paid. It then sent a revised invoice and statement showing a balance outstanding of $11,886.78. XL now claims that amount from II and BI. [4] II and BI...

5. Director of Proceedings v Health New Zealand [2024] NZHRRT 37 [pdf, 710 KB]

   ...RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2024] NZHRRT 37 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [1] These proceedings under the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 were filed on 26 March 2024. Prior to the filing of the proceedings the parties resolved all matters in issue and the Tribunal is asked to make a consent declaration. The parties have filed: [1.1] A statement of claim dated 26 March 2024. [1.2] A consent memorandum dated 25 March 2024. [1.3] An agreed summary of facts, a copy o...

6. Gollins v CAC 20002 [2014] NZREADT 52 [pdf, 69 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2014] NZREADT 52 READT 010/14 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN CHRISTOPHER GOLLINS of Wellington, Real Estate Agent Appellant/ Defendant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 20002) Respondent/Prosecutor MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Ms N Dangen - Member Ms C Sandelin - Member BY CONSENT HEARD ON THE PAPERS DATE O...

7. EU & SU v KC [2024] NZDT 615 (15 July 2024) [pdf, 128 KB]

   ...(PLA). 4. KC would like the old retaining wall removed and a new retaining wall and fence to be built on the legal boundary. KC would like the Trust to pay for all of this work because it is the Trust’s land that is being retained. KC says the matter should be dealt with in the District Court because the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to make orders about wrongly placed structures. He has asked for this claim to be transferred to the District Court. 5. After the first heari...

8. [2015] NZEmpC 94 NZ Meat Workers & Related Trades Union Inc v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...refuse the interlocutory remedy in the event that the plaintiffs do succeed. [9] The interlocutory relief sought being discretionary, the Court is required to stand back from the detail of the first two tests and determine whether the overall justice of the case warrants the grant of an injunction as sought. [10] The following is the essential context in which the application has come before the Court. [11] AFFCO owns and operates a meat slaughtering and processing plant at Rang...

9. Non-discrimination standards for government guidelines [pdf, 392 KB]

   ...“Human Rights Act”. 5 • Staff who work with non-government agencies and other service providers who are performing a “public function” (the “public function” test is outlined further below at page 14). Note: In March 2000, the Ministry of Justice published Guidelines for Government Policy Advisors on the Human Rights Act 1993. In light of the changes to the Human Rights Act, and the adoption of the Bill of Rights Act standard for assessment of discrimination in most Governme...

10. Rata v Rata - Takahiwai 5F1 [2023] Chief Judge's MB 60 (2023 CJ 60) [pdf, 262 KB]

    ...Judge’s MB 60 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TAITOKERAU In the Maori Land Court of New Zealand Taitokerau District A20200001143 CJ 2020/3 WĀHANGA Under Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Takahiwai 5F1 Block I WAENGA I A Between ME And HIRIA RATA Te Kaitono Applicant CHRISTINE RATA, CARMEL RATA, KARE RATA, TE WAIKOHUA RATA, NICOLA MACDONALD AND HOHAIA RATA Ngā Kaiurupare Responden...