8539 items matching your search terms
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND ENV-2020-AKL-000099 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal under clause 14(1) of the First Schedule of the Resource Management Act 1991 in relation to the Proposed Waikato Regional Plan Change 1: Waikato and Waipa Catchments BETWEEN Beef + Lamb New Zealand Limited Appellant AND Waikato Regional Council Respondent NOTICE OF BALLANCE AGRI-NUTRIENTS LIMITIED...
[2018] NZSSAA 035 Reference No. SSaA 157/17 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXX against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY S Pezaro - Deputy Chair C Joe - Member Hearing at Whangarei on 23 May 2018 Appearances The appellant in person P Siueva, agent for the Chief Executive DECISION Background [1] XXXX (the appellant) appeals t...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2013] NZREADT 12 READT 035/12 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.112 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN DENIS FETHERSTON Appellant AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC20005) First Respondent AND RICHARD MILNE Second Respondent MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Ms K Davenport – Chairperson Mr J Gaukrodger – Member Mr G Denley – Member HEARD AT AUCKLAND 29 Jan...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I MUA I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Kl OTAUTAHI IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 146 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act RIVER TERRACE DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED (ENV-2020-CHC-6) Appellant CENTRAL OTAGO DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Hearing: In Chambers at Christchurch Date of Decision: 7 September...
GEORGINA RACHELLE v AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED [2020] NZEmpC 95 [1 July 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2020] NZEmpC 95 EMPC 250/2017 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN GEORGINA RACHELLE Plaintiff AND AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing...
...sent to Mr QA enclosing an application form and advising him that the last day for filing an application for review was Friday 17 October 2014. 2 [5] On 15 October 2014, Mr QA deposited the application fee for review into the Ministry of Justice account. On 17 October 2014, Mr QA forwarded, by email, an application for review to the LCRO. The email was sent at 5.01 p.m. [6] By letter dated 23 October 2014 Mr IZ wrote to the LCRO challenging the jurisdiction of the LCRO to...
BRIAN MOXEY V WESTMINSTER PACIFIC (NZ) LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2012] NZEmpC 16 [8 February 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2012] NZEmpC 16 ARC 87/11 IN THE MATTER OF an application for compliance order BETWEEN BRIAN MOXEY Plaintiff AND WESTMINSTER PACIFIC (NZ) LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 8 February 2012 (Heard at Auckland) Counsel: Carl Blake, counsel for plaintiff No appearance for the defendant Judgment: 8 February 2012...
...under s29, namely where the gender of a child is in issue, the Act contains no provisions for the appointment of a lawyer to represent the child or requirement for the child’s views to be ascertained, despite the application clearly being about a matter which clearly affects them in a very fundamental way. To not have a process which enables the child to have an opportunity to express their views and which requires those views to be taken into account, is inconsistent with our inte...
THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN AND Decision [2021] NZEnvC ottq the direct referral under s 87G of an application under s 127 of the Resource Management Act 1991 KRISTIN SCHOOL CHARITABLE TRUST (ENV-2021-AKL-000014) Applicant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Consent Authority Court: Environment Judge MJL Dickey Last case event: Waiver application filed by D Tolich dated 15 March 2021 Waiver application file...
...protected wildlife, it is essential to have an effective enforcement regime in place. Ability of the defendant to exonerate themselves 12. Strict liability or a reversal of the onus of proof can also be justified where the offence turns on a matter that is particularly within the knowledge of the defendant. In such cases, it is easier for the defendant to explain why he or she took (or failed to take) a particular course of action than it is for the Crown to prove the opposite....