Search Results

1. [2009] NZEmpC AC 32/09 LAL (Trading as Glomax Super Tailors) v Yeleswaram [pdf, 20 KB]

   LAL (TRADING AS GLOMAX SUPER TAILORS) V YELESWARAM (LABOUR INSPECTOR) AK AC 32/09 8 September 2009 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 32/09 ARC 6/09 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN RAMESH LAL TRADING AS GLOMAX SUPER TAILORS Plaintiff AND RAMA YELESWARAM (LABOUR INSPECTOR) Defendant Hearing: 8 September 2009 (by telephone conference call) Appearances: Sanjay Sharma, Counsel for Plaintiff...

2. Media Protocol 2017 - Youth Courts [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...leave to publish should be granted, the welfare and best interests of the child or young person shall be the first and paramount consideration: s 6 of the Act applies to s 438. This is one of the rare situations in which this section applies to youth justice proceedings. 6. If leave to publish is granted, the permission will usually be unconditional. On some occasions the leave to publish may be subject to specified conditions. 7. It is only in rare cases that leave to publish wil...

3. Directory of Official Information D-F [pdf, 989 KB]

   ...Directory of Official Information Listings D-F About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture oia@justice.govt.nz mailto:oia@...

4. Wall v Fairfax New Zealand Ltd (Delay) [2017] NZHRRT 8 [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...Interim order applications are also determined by the Chair (s 95). All decisions of the Tribunal are written by the Chairperson. 3 [7] The Chairperson is presently the only member of the Tribunal. The Panel maintained by the Minister of Justice under s 101 is a separate statutory entity which is drawn on by both the Chairperson and by the High Court. Members of the Panel are only ever members of a “tribunal” when appointed by the Chairperson for the purposes of a particular...

5. ZYX v Attorney-General Non-Publication Order [2014] NZHRRT 44 [pdf, 39 KB]

   ...mental capacity is said to be that of a two to three year old child. Because the plaintiffs have an unusual surname, the identity of their children as persons with disabilities will be simple to deduce. Removal of the decision from the Ministry of Justice website is requested. [3] The Attorney-General opposes removal of the decision from the website but submits the Tribunal should consider anonymising the plaintiffs’ name to protect the privacy interests of their children. The Attor...

6. Sherard v Devereux and others - Otakanini Māori Reservatio (Haranui Marae) (2016) 140 Taitokerau MB 60 (140 TTK 60) [pdf, 243 KB]

   140 Taitokerau MB 60 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20160005567 UNDER Section 19, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Otakanini Māori Reservation (Haranui Marae) BETWEEN JANE SHERARD Applicant AND CAROLE DEVEREUX, ARIANNA HART, TRACEY HILL, JOHN HOHEPA, DENISE HOHEPA-HAPETA, RIKI MANUKAU, TUMANAKO POVEY, JOSEPH TIMOTI, CHERITH VAHA'AKOLO, RATU WAATA AND KAPU WILCOX AS TRUSTEES OF T...

7. G v EQC [2020] CEIT-2020-0010 [pdf, 226 KB]

   IN THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL CEIT—0010-2020 IN THE MATTER OF CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL ACT 2019 BETWEEN G Applicant AND EQC First Respondent AND SR Second Respondent (Discontinued) Date: 20 November 2020 On the papers __________________________________________________________________________________ DECISION OF MEMBER C D BOYS (NO 2) ______________________...

8. LCRO 005/2019 JB v QE (10 April 2019) [pdf, 89 KB]

   ...undertaken on the papers pursuant to s 206(2) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 (the Act) because it appears that it can be adequately determined on the basis of the information available. Neither party has provided reasons that suggest this matter should proceed to a hearing in person, although Mr JB said “he is comfortable” with a hearing on the papers provided “a just decision” is issued, which is not a reason for having a hearing in person. Having carefully read...

9. Directory of Official Information D-F [pdf, 1004 KB]

   ...Directory of Official Information Listings D-F About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture oia@justice.govt.nz mailto:oia@...

10. LCRO 35/2020 RS v HM (27 May 2020) [pdf, 86 KB]

    ...Ms HM considered the information Mr RS had provided and indicated her preliminary view was that he would be unlikely to succeed. 2 [4] Undeterred, Mr RS wished to proceed. [5] Ms HM informed Mr RS that she was not prepared to work on his matter under legal aid. Ms HM said she would accept Mr RS’s instructions if he paid her $10,000 in advance, and that she would provide him with a formal written opinion. [6] Mr RS did not pay $10,000. [7] The retainer did not proceed....