Search Results

1. [2011] NZEmpC 108 Auckland District Health Board v Bierre [pdf, 145 KB]

   AUCKLAND DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD V KATE BIERRE NZEmpC AK [2011] NZEmpC 108 [22 August 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2011] NZEmpC 108 ARC 2/11 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN AUCKLAND DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD Plaintiff AND KATE BIERRE Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions filed on 25 May, and 3 and 13 June 2011 Appearances: Michael O'Brien and Nura Taefi, coun...

2. [2015] NZEmpC 123 D’Arcy-Smith v Natural Habitats Ltd [pdf, 174 KB]

   GRAHAM D'ARCY-SMITH v NATURAL HABITATS LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 123 [28 July 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 123 ARC 57/14 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN GRAHAM D'ARCY-SMITH Plaintiff AND NATURAL HABITATS LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 7-8 May 2015 (Heard at Taupo) Appearances: Plaintiff in person L Herzog, c...

3. CEIT Practice Notes 2022 [pdf, 460 KB]

   ........................................................................................................ 12 Chapter - Six Hearings ....................................................................................................................... 14 Chapter Seven - Other matters ......................................................................................................... 17 Ongoing communication ....................................................................................

4. Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination – summary record 12th-14th reports (continued) [pdf, 125 KB]

   ...p.m. Chairman: Mr. DIACONU CONTENTS CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS, COMMENTS AND INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 9 OF THE CONVENTION (continued) Twelfth to fourteenth periodic reports of New Zealand ORGANIZATIONAL AND OTHER MATTERS (continued) Discussion of a document on organizational matters of interest to the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (continued) This record is subject to correction. Corrections should be submit...

5. LCRO 78/2020 NS v GL (29 June 2021) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...application to the High Court for costs was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. • “Mrs NS applied to the Court of Appeal for recall of its [date] 2017 judgment. In the alternative, Mrs NS sought an extension of time to appeal the decision of Justice [X] that she did not have jurisdiction.”2 • “…the Court of Appeal ordered the recall of its [date] 2017 judgment. It amended the judgment to include an order that Mr NS pay Mrs NS’s costs in the High Court.”3 �€...

6. [2018] NZEnvC 186 Housing New Zealand Corporation v Auckland Council [pdf, 3.6 MB]

   BEFORETHEEN~RONMENTCOURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND Decision No: [2018] NZEnvC '66 of an appeal under the Resource Management Act 1991 and the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 HOUSING NEW ZEALAND CORPORATION (ENV -20 16-AKL -0000238) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge C J Thompson Date of Decision: Environment Commissioner K A Edmonds Deputy Environment Commissioner R...

7. [2025] NZEmpC 76 Vegepod NZ Ltd v Lowe [pdf, 291 KB]

   VEGEPOD NZ LIMITED v ANDREW LOWE [2025] NZEmpC 76 [14 April 2025] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2025] NZEmpC 76 EMPC 90/2025 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN VEGEPOD NZ LIMITED Plaintiff AND ANDREW LOWE First Defendant AND LISA MARIE LOWE Second Defendant Hearing: 31 March 2025 (Heard at Welling...

8. [2015] NZEmpC 190 Brown v Adams t/a Untouchable Hair & Skin [pdf, 144 KB]

   ...Chin. Other special and unusual circumstances will no doubt arise and each will fall to be considered on a case-by-case basis. The threshold test to be applied is whether the applicant can establish a real or substantial risk of a miscarriage of justice if the judgment is allowed to stand. [14] The rehearing jurisdiction is not to be exercised for the purpose of re-agitating arguments already considered by the Court or providing a backdoor method by which unsuccessful litigant...

9. [2011] NZEmpC 175 Maynard v Bay of Plenty DHB [pdf, 105 KB]

   CHRISTINE MAYNARD V BAY OF PLENTY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD NZEmpC AK [2011] NZEmpC 175 [22 December 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2011] NZEmpC 175 ARC 118/10 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN CHRISTINE MAYNARD Plaintiff AND BAY OF PLENTY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions filed on 24 and 30 June and 15 July 2011 Appearances: Stan Austin, a...

10. [2023] NZEnvC 059 Balmoral Developments (Outram) Limited v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 375 KB]

    ...authorities, including the court, must apply the NPS-HPL to land within the scope of cl 3.5(7)(a) where it is not excluded by the exemptions in cl 3.5(7)(b). [92] There is no retrospectivity in this approach and nor is it a breach of natural justice. [93] The NPS-HPL applies prospectively to matters which the Council and/or the Environment Court are required to make decisions about, after the commencement date of the NPS-HPL. The appellants will be able to bring evidence to the...