Search Results

1. Marine and Coastal Area - Provisions for protecting customary interests [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...exercised in a particular part of the common marine and coastal area in accordance with tikanga by the applicant group, whether it continues to be exercised in exactly the same or a similar way, or evolves over time; and c) is not extinguished as a matter of law. A PCR cannot be recognised in relation to:  an activity regulated under the Fisheries Act 1996 (section 51(2)(a));  a commercial aquaculture activity (within the meaning of section 4 of the Māori Commercial Aquacu...

2. [2020] NZEmpC 74 New Zealand Post Primary Teachers’ Association Inc v Secretary for Education [pdf, 237 KB]

   ...to it. [47] Ordinarily we would have little sympathy for the objection and the fall-back position that more evidence might be required. However, we are concerned that the issues are so significant that it is important, in the interests of justice, to make reasonable efforts to ensure that the real controversy is before the Court. It is tolerably clear that the defendants have more relevant evidence to present. To decline the defendants an opportunity to call more evid...

3. NR v HT [2019] NZDT 1335 (6 November 2019) [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...disputed recollections, it was not possible to make a finding that the conversation contained any misleading information. Mr R also pointed out that Mr U had directed him to Mr T for further information and had declined to give his own advice about a matter that would have been within his expertise. However, Mr T and Mr U both acted for the vendors, and had no duty under the contract to advise Mr R about the state of the boat. Furthermore, Mr U had only passed on the report. He had no...

4. Pue v Tapatu - Okawa A1B (2011) 268 Aotea MB 93 (268 AOT 93) [pdf, 165 KB]

   PUE V TAPATU MLC 268 Aotea MB 93 8 July 2011 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT 268 Aotea MB 93 (268 AOT 93) A20110002330 UNDER Section 19, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Okawa A1B BETWEEN SUSAN PUE Applicant AND RAY TAPATU, CHRISTINE TAPATU, IRENE TAPATU Respondents Hearing: 265 Aotea MB 243 dated 15 April 2011 267 Aotea MB 246 dated 1 July 2011 (Heard at New Plymouth) Appearances: Mr G Takar...

5. Te Manutukutuku Issue 33 [pdf, 5.2 MB]

   ...in the region. The claims have been grouped to ensure all issues relating to Taranaki are considered at the hearings. The claims mostly concern Crown purchases prior to the 1860s, the Taranaki wars and the confiscation of lands from that time. Matters relating to the return of some of the confiscated lands, and the way in which lands returned have been administered (by the Public, Native, then Maori Trustee), are also covered. Evidence was presented to the Tribunal by interested par...

6. Waitangi Tribunal - issue 53 of Te Manutukutuku [pdf, 481 KB]

   ...Hospital Report Moving Forward New Woman Judges New Staff Protecting Mäori Intellectual and Cultural Property Haratua/Pipiri 2001 52 May/June 2001 KEY CLAIMS Moriori claim that the Crown should have intervened to protect their Treaty rights to justice, protection and equal citizenship when they were sub- jected to slavery after 1840. They were par- ticularly critical of the 1870 Native Land Court determination that treated them as a defeated people and granted 97 percent of Re...

7. BORA Misuse of Drugs Amendment Bill [pdf, 124 KB]

   ...Controlling and regulating drugs, para 10.95 5 avoid the possibility of wrongful convictions resulting from operation of the presumption. Tipping J stated:10 …it becomes crucial at what quantity of the drug the presumption is fixed. It matters whether the trigger amount is set on the basis that possession of such an amount raises a bare probability that the purpose of the possession is supply, a high probability that such is the accused’s purpose, or a near certainty....

8. [2009] NZEmpC WC 27/09 Griffiths Drilling (NZ) Ltd v Jenner [pdf, 24 KB]

   GRIFFITHS DRILLING (NZ) LTD V JENNER WN WC 27/09 26 November 2009 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON WC 27/09 WRC 37/09 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for stay of proceedings BETWEEN GRIFFITHS DRILLING (NZ) LIMITED Plaintiff AND SELWYN RICHARD JENNER Defendant Hearing: 26 November 2009 (Heard at Wellington) Appearances: Wendy Aldred, Counsel for Plaintif...

9. [2011] NZEmpC 64 Brake v Grace Team Accounting [pdf, 78 KB]

   JUDITH BRAKE V GRACE TEAM ACCOUNTING LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2011] NZEmpC 64 [20 June 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2011] NZEmpC 64 ARC 108/10 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF interlocutory applications BETWEEN JUDITH BRAKE Plaintiff AND GRACE TEAM ACCOUNTING LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 10 June 2011 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: Warwick Reid, a...

10. Jia v Wang [2011] NZIACDT 33 (19 October 2011) [pdf, 70 KB]

    BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2011] NZIACDT 33 Reference No: IACDT 018/10 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY Immigration Advisers Authority Authority BETWEEN Na Jia Complainant AND Wei Wang (Summer) Adviser DECISION IMPOSITION OF DISCIPLINARY SANCTIONS REPRESENTATION: Adviser In person Compla...