8514 items matching your search terms
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No. [2009] NZLCDT 9 LCDT 08/2009 IN THE MATTER of the Law Practitioners Act 1982 BETWEEN CANTERBURY DISTRICT LAW SOCIETY AND DAVID ALAN WOOD CHAIR Mr D J Mackenzie MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr W Chapman Ms J Gray Mr A Lamont Ms S Ineson HEARING: at CHRISTCHURCH on 27 July 2009 APPEARANCES Mr G Nation for the Complaints Committee of the Otago Di...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Court: Hearing: Appearances: Date of Decision: Date of Issue: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC '2. ~ it- of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 of an appeal pursuant to s 58 of the Act BETTY KING, PANIA NEWTON, NGA KAITIAKI 0 IHUMATAO CHARITABLE TRUST and SOUL IHUMATAO (ENV-2017 -AKL-000160) Appellants HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE TAONGA Respo...
...called, you must tell the court your name. Addressing judges A judge of the High Court must be addressed as Your Honour, Sir (male) or Ma’am (female). If you want to refer to another judge: a judge of the High Court and above is referred to as Justice [Surname] a judge of the District Court and below is referred to as Judge [Surname]. You must stand up when you are speaking to the judge or the judge is speaking to you (unless you are unable to). Only one person should be standing at a...
BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2016] NZIACDT 51 Reference No: IACDT 048/14 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar BETWEEN Thi Thanh Thu Nguyen Complainant AND Yijun Hu Adviser DECISION (SANCTIONS) REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Marija Urlich, lawy...
295 Aotea MB 17 WHANGANUI DISTRICT COUNCIL MLC A20100013105 [21 December 2012] IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20100013105 UNDER Section 231 Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Kai Iwi 5G3A1, 5G3A2, 5G3B, 5G3C, 5H1 & 5H2 BETWEEN WHANGANUI DISTRICT COUNCIL Applicant Hearing: 294 Aotea MB 145-155 dated 11 December 2012 286 Aotea MB 273-279 dated 10 July 2012 284 Aotea MB 59-63 dated 15 May 2012 281 Aotea...
Case study from Recommendations recap A summary of coronial recommendations and comments made between 1 July–30 September 2012 FORESTRY DEATHS FROM ISSUE 4 O F N E W Z E A L A N D CHIEF CORONER O F F I C E O F T H E http://www.justice.govt.nz/courts/coroners-court/ 2 Published by the Ministry of Justice ISSN 2253-5152 Disclaimer This publication has been produced by research counsel of the Office of the Chief Coroner, with the best efforts made to accurately summarise the...
NANZHENG LIU V SOUTH PACIFIC TIMBER (1990) LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2011] NZEmpC 100 [10 August 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2011] NZEmpC 100 ARC 106/10 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to file challenge out of time BETWEEN NANZHENG LIU Intending Plaintiff AND SOUTH PACIFIC TIMBER (1990) LIMITED Intended Defendant Hearing: 22 July 2011 (Heard at Auckland) Counsel: Rodney Hooker and Charlotte Taylor, counsel for intending plai...
...MINISTER AND CABINET Third Defendant AND IMMIGRATION NEW ZEALAND Fourth Defendant AND MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT Fifth Defendant AND MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND TRADE Sixth Defendant AND MINISTRY OF JUSTICE Seventh Defendant AND NEW ZEALAND POLICE Eighth Defendant 3 Background [1] By decision in Dotcom v Crown Law Office [2018] NZHRRT 7 (26 March 2018) at [255] the Tribunal made the following orders: [255] For...
NEIL POLLETT V BROWNS REAL ESTATE LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2011] NZEmpC 116 [23 September 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2011] NZEmpC 116 ARC 46/11 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to challenge out of time BETWEEN NEIL POLLETT Intending Plaintiff AND BROWNS REAL ESTATE LIMITED Intended Defendant Hearing: 21 September 2011 (by telephone conference call) Appearances: Plaintiff in person Jessie Parker, counsel for defendant Ju...
...is in the following terms: 92L Costs (1) In any proceedings under section 92B or section 92E or section 97, the Tribunal may make any award as to costs that it thinks fit, whether or not it grants any other remedy. (2) Without limiting the matters that the Tribunal may consider in determining whether to make an award of costs under this section, the Tribunal may take into account whether, and to what extent, any party to the proceedings— (a) has participated in good faith in th...