Search Results

1. LCRO 207/2015 CA v BE (21 August 2018) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...company’s position. Mr BE responded to the correspondence received from the company. [5] On 6 August 2015, Mrs CA complained to the New Zealand Law Society Complaints Service (NZLS) about the content and tone of Mr BE’s correspondence. [6] The matter progressed to the Employment Relations Authority and was resolved at mediation on [Date] 2015. The complaint and the Standards Committee decision [7] The substance of Mrs CA’s complaint was that: (a) Mr BE had handled the e...

2. [2008] NZEmpC WC 18/08 Arthur D Riley & Co Ltd v Wood [pdf, 67 KB]

   ARTHUR D RILEY & CO LTD V WOOD WN WC 18/08 8 October 2008 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON WC 18/08 WRC 25/07 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN ARTHUR D RILEY & CO LIMITED Plaintiff AND JESSICA SHARON WOOD Defendant Hearing: 23 and 24 July 2008 (Heard at Wellington) Appearances: T P Cleary and Blair Scotland, Counsel for Plaintiff D D Vincent and Ankit Bhasin, Counsel for Defendant...

3. [2023] NZEnvC 095 Country Lifestyles Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 428 KB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2023] NZEnvC 095 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 358 and applications under s 311 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN COUNTRY LIFESTYLES LIMITED (ENV-2021-AKL-051) Appellant INFOTECH ACCOUNTANTS LIMITED (ENV-2021-AKL-149) CHARLES WEDD (ENV-2022-AKL-001) AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Judge MJL Dickey Environment Commissioner ACE Leijnen Environment C...

4. AJ v ZQ LCRO 134 / 2010 (7 February 2011) [pdf, 139 KB]

   ...charged by the Applicant in connection with the sale, but her complaint essentially in this regard relates to the fact that he retained the sum of $5,000 against potential costs that may be incurred by his firm (WM) to subsequently resolve the matter. [19] The Respondent also complained that the Applicant had charged for attendances in connection with the dispute, which she states should not be her cost. The Standards Committee’s decision [20] The Standards Committee issued i...

5. Short - Tumu Kaituna 14 (2021) 249 Waiariki MB 71 (249 WAR 71) [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...71 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TE WAIARIKI In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Waiariki District A20180002509 WĀHANGA Under Section 98(3) Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Tumu Kaituna 14 - Application for Special Aid I WAENGA I A Between MALCOLM SHORT, ANARU BIDOIS, UENUKU FAIRHALL, PIRIHIRA CHRISTINE JANET FENWICK, WALDO HOUIA AND EMILY ROTA AS TRUSTEES OF TUMU KAITUNA 14 TRUST...

6. Fehling v Appleby (Recusal Application) [2014] NZHRRT 11 [pdf, 65 KB]

   ...faithfully reported events as seen from their respective perspectives. The difficulty, however, is that in her brief of evidence Ms Sloane largely reported the untested but nevertheless prejudicial views of others. When in her evidence she attested to matters within her in own knowledge, the evidence of Ms Sloane was largely in favour of Mr Fehling or at least neutral. [61] As to Ms Adamson, we accept she is sincere in her belief that she does not feel safe in the presence of Mr Fehl...

7. LCRO 272/2015 PA v NT, RO and DS (31 August 2018) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...[11] The Committee delivered its decision on 16 November 2015 and determined, pursuant to s 138(2) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 (the Act), that no further action on the complaint was necessary or appropriate. [12] As a preliminary matter, the Committee stated that because, in the course of its investigation, it had not identified any conduct issues concerning Ms RO and Mr DS it therefore resolved to take no further action concerning Mrs PA’s complaints about them. (1)...

8. [2018] NZSSAA 25 (25 May 2018) [pdf, 264 KB]

   [2018] NZSSAA 25 Reference No. SSAA 003/17 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXX against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Mr G Pearson - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member Mr C Joe - Member Hearing on the papers Appearances The Appellant by her lawyer Mr K Callinicos, Willis Legal, XXXX For Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Developme...

9. Recording Industry Association of New Zealand v Telecom NZ 3663 [2013] NZCOP 7 [pdf, 59 KB]

   ...appropriately redacted in the documents received by the Tribunal). In a letter dated 12 October 2012, the applicant sent a reply to the challenge notice. Following receipt of the enforcement notice, the account holder made a submission (email to copyright@justice.govt.nz, dated 24 January 2012), to which the applicant responded with a letter of 12 February 2013. That letter set out the applicant’s reply submissions. The latter document stipulates that, on the facts of this case, the...

10. CR v TN LCRO 54/2014 (23 November 2016) [pdf, 75 KB]

    ...2 were included in charges brought against Mr CR before the Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal. [5] In 2007 Mr TN and Mr CR acted for opposing parties in litigation. Mr TN’s client was Mr VH. [6] Mr CR was unhappy with various matters that arose during the course of that litigation and in December 2010 he commenced proceedings personally against Mr TN and Mr VH. He pleaded five causes of action: • maintenance/champerty; • abuse of process (malicious civil proc...