Search Results

1. Koia – Estate of Hoani Tau Takahi (2015) 133 Waiariki MB 273 (133 WAR 273) [pdf, 194 KB]

   133 Waiariki MB 273 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20150002093 UNDER Sections 113, 118 Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Hoani Tau Takahi or John Hoani Tau or John Hoani Takahi (deceased) BETWEEN NANCYE ANGELINE KOIA Applicant Hearings: 127 Waiariki MB 59-64 dated 3 September 2015 (Heard at Rotorua) Judgment: 22 December 2015 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE L R HARVEY Introduction [1] Nancye Koia wi...

2. Wai 3300, 6.2.018 Wānanga ā-rohe background paper [pdf, 598 KB]

   ...the Kotahitanga movement, and organisations such as the Iwi Chairs Forum, the New Zealand Māori Council and the Māori Women’s Welfare League. Tikanga In Lex Aotearoa: An Heroic Attempt to Map the Māori Dimension in Modern New Zealand Law, Justice Tā Joe Williams explains that tikanga denotes law, and that it was a ‘system by which correctness, rightness or justice is maintained’.15 This system also includes ‘customs or behaviours that might not be called law but rather cu...

3. ENV-2016-AKL-000198 G M Welsford Family Trust v Auckland Council [pdf, 12 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND ENV-2016-AKL- IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (LGATPA) and the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) of an appeal under section 156(1) of the LGATPA against a decision of the Auckland Council on a recommendation of the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel (Hearings Panel) on the proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (Proposed...

4. AB v CD LCRO 332/2013 [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...relied on that in deciding to decline cover for Mr CD under the policy. [30] On 21 March 2012 Mr CD ended his retainer with Mr AB and instructed his solicitor, Mr [IJ], to make enquiries of Mr AB, and request written responses from him.7 The matters Mr [IJ] raised included Mr AB having advised [Insurer] that it had grounds to decline cover to Mr CD under the policy. Mr [IJ] referred to Mr CD having continued to instruct Mr AB in the negligence proceedings at his own expense, and t...

5. Otago Standards Committee v Claver [2019] NZLCDT 8 [pdf, 343 KB]

   ...practitioner was deliberately misleading, he was at least reckless in making the statements he made. Mr Shaw also accepts that the practitioner was stressed and unwell at the time. [7] In relation to the false declaration to the Law Society, a matter which the Tribunal views very seriously, the Standards Committee pointed to Mr Claver’s acceptance, in evidence, that there were at least two aspects of the order that he had not complied with. [8] The self-reporting aspect contain...

6. McLenachan v ACC [2013] NZACA 11 [pdf, 97 KB]

   BEFORE THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY AT WELLINGTON [2013] NZACA 11 ACA 10/12 IN THE MATTER of the Accident Compensation Act 1982 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal pursuant to s 107 of the Act BETWEEN STEPHEN MCLENACHAN Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent HEARING: at Wellington on 2 May 2013 AUTHORITY: Robyn Bedford COUNSEL: S McLenachan, appellant P McBride for respondent...

7. Directory of Official Information 2019 S-U [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   ...Information Listings S-U About This is a living document; we endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email official.correspondence@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. official.correspondence@justice.govt.nz Ministerial Services Strategy, Governance & Finance mailto:official.correspondence@justice.govt.nz mailto:official.correspondence@justice.gov...

8. NZ Private Prosecution Service Ltd v Key (Strike-Out Application) [2015] NZHRRT 48 [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...The question of standing is logically distinct from and prior to the merits of the proceedings because the particular interest a person may claim to have in a case is usually different from the whole of that case. [28] The authors point out that no matter how it is framed, a requirement of standing demands a connection between the applicant’s interests and the relief sought. Standing rules, therefore, are designed to ensure that applicants litigate only their business. Then at [11.50...

9. LCRO 181/2017 FW and KP v BG (31 October 2019) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...played by [Architecture Firm A], on 23 June 2015 Mr FW and Ms KP gave written notice of termination to [Architecture Firm A] of its appointment as architect. [7] Mr FW and Mr KP were referred, by their lawyer, to the firm for legal advice on both matters. On 1 July 2015 they met with Mr HM, and Ms AZ, both lawyers employed by the firm, and supervised by Mr BG. Mr HM provided a letter of advice to them on 10 July 2015 which I refer to in some detail in my later analysis. [8] By 2...

10. Daunton v CAC 10065 & Morgan [2012] NZREADT 71 [pdf, 76 KB]

    BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2012] NZREADT 71 READT 107/11 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN JOHN DAUNTON Appellant AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 10065) First respondent AND JASON MORGAN Second respondent MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Mr G Denley - Member Mr J Gaukrodger - Member HEARD at CHRISTCHURCH on 5 and 6 September 2012 with a...