LCRO 151/2016 and 157/2016 NS v TD and TD v NS (27 September 2018) [pdf, 325 KB]
...weight and worth as to not require any challenge or response. The fact that Ms P had been a client of his (in an earlier application by her for a protection order against Mr L), was of no moment. [29] Mr NS raised other Family Court procedural matters but, as the central point is whether by continuing to act for Mr L when Ms P’s Facebook material was offered against him he became conflicted, those other matters may be put aside. Mr TD’s response [30] In his response dated 22...