Search Results

1. Young people & infringement fines: a qualitative study [pdf, 139 KB]

   Young People and Infringement Fines: A Qualitative Study Prepared for the Ministry of Justice by Litmus Limited October 2005 2 DISCLAIMER This research was commissioned by the Ministry of Justice. The report has been prepared by the research company and the views expressed in it are those of the research company and do not necessarily represent the views of the Ministry of Justice. First published in October 2005 by the Ministry of Justice PO Box 180 Wellington New Zealand ISBN 0-...

2. Tranche 2 of Cabinet and Ministerial advice on changes to clubs and ranges regulations [pdf, 3.8 MB]

   I N C O N F I D E N C E 1 I N C O N F I D E N C E In Confidence Office of the Associate Minister of Justice Cabinet Social Outcomes Committee Firearms reform programme – Phase 2: Finalising proposals for improved regulation of shooting clubs and ranges Proposal 1 This paper seeks agreement to amend Part 6 of the Arms Act 1983 (the Act) and Parts 5 and 6 of the Arms Regulations 1992 (the Regulations) to improve the way shooting clubs and shooting ranges are regu...

3. Te Manutukutuku Issue 71 [pdf, 7.9 MB]

   ...Waitangi Tribunal Level 7, Fujitsu Tower 141 The Terrace Wellington New Zealand DX SX11237 Tel : 64 4 914 3000 Fax : 64 4 914 3001 www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Te Manutukutuku is produced and published by the Waitangi Tribunal Unit of the Ministry of Justice, and every effort has been made to ensure that it is true and correct at the date of publication. I n this issue, we feature the Te Papa­ rahi o te Raki (Northland) regional inquiry, in which the hearings of claim­ ant, Crown, an...

4. LCRO 38-2015 PF v MF [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...12 March 2014 responding in part to Ms K’s complaint against him, Mr PF raised the following issues about Ms GG’s conduct: (a) In email correspondence to Mr T’s former lawyer dated 11 April 2011, Ms GG attempted to pervert the course of justice by blackmailing Mr T into accepting settlement terms, as follows (the threat): I have received instructions from [Ms K] that she will settle o the following basis. This is her final offer which she requires to be signed off tomorrow...

5. Guo v PwC (Further Discovery) [2022] NZHRRT 6 [pdf, 309 KB]

   ...by Dr Culpan when he was practising at CityMed. Discovery and the importance of relevance [14] Central to the obligation on a party to disclose documents that are or have been in that party’s control is the relevance of those documents to the matters in issue as defined by the pleadings. See for example RHH Ltd v Anderson [2018] NZHC 2039 at [12]: [12] Relevance is determined by the pleadings. In standard discovery, a document is relevant if the document or its contents could be...

6. [2017] NZEnvC 207 Auckland Council [pdf, 734 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND AND BY Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC '£,.0+ of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an application for resource consent for diversions and discharges associated with the Auckland stormwater network of an originating application under s291 of the Act for waivers and directions under s281 of the Act in relation to the service of the application AUCKLAND COUNCIL (ENV-2017 -AKL-000169)...

7. LCRO 024/2018 NN v AE (23 April 2019) [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...options for consideration by Ms NN for response by 4.00 pm that day. First, he and Mrs SL would claim compensation in the [Disputes] Tribunal; secondly, he would complain to the Law Society about Ms NN’s conduct; and thirdly, they could settle the matter themselves thereby allowing Ms NN to apologise for her “error”. [13] Nine days later, on Saturday, 25 February 2017, Ms NN, while at home, learned from another client that Mrs SL, when showing the client through a house for...

8. LCRO 121/2023 AI v HR (12 December 2023) [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...High Court proceedings for relief in relation to the relevant relationship property settlement. It considered that this issue would be more appropriately dealt with by the High Court. [42] On that basis, the Committee decided not to take “the matter” any further and recorded that if the applicant was successful in his High Court applications, he might consider re-filing his complaint in light of the High Court’s decision. [43] The Committee formally decided to take no further a...

9. ENV-2016-AKL-000197 Adams v Auckland Council [pdf, 4.2 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND ENV-2016-AKL- IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER AND of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (LGATPA) and the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) of an appeal under section 156(1) of the LGATPA against a decision of the Auckland Council on a recommendation of the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel (Hearings Panel) on the proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (Proposed Plan) IN THE MATTER of Proposed Plan...

10. Manning - Kirikiri Pawhaoa B2A1 [2011] Maori Appellate Court MB 215 (2011 APPEAL 215) [pdf, 204 KB]

    ...Appellate Court MB 215 13 April 2011 IN THE MAORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT 2011 Maori Appellate Court MB 215 (2011 APPEAL 215) A20100009007 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal against an order of the Maori Land Court made on 14 May 2010 at 5 Taitokerau MB 234-246 in respect of KIRIKIRI PAWHAOA B2A1 BETWEEN MAX MANNING AND HUMPHREY O'LEARY Appellants Hearing: 9 November...