8484 items matching your search terms
2017 Chief Judge’s MB 35 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAKITIMU DISTRICT A20100005395 CJ 2010/14 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Hiromina Ratima Pakai or Hiromina Mabel Renata (Deceased) WIKITORIA KIRIONA Applicant Judgment: 02 February 2017 DECISION OF CHIEF JUDGE W W ISAAC 2017 Chief Judge’s MB 36 Introduction...
...WAITANGI B3 TRUST MLC 17 Taitokerau MB 294 16 March 2011 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT 17 Taitokerau MB 294 (17 TTK 294) A20100003350 UNDER Section 239, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Te Tii Waitangi B3 BETWEEN TE TII WAITANGI B3 TRUST Applicant Hearing: 26 May 2010 15 October 2010 20 December 2010 (Heard at Whangarei) Judgment: 16 March 2011 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE D J AMBLER Intr...
...view in the exercise of its powers and functions • develop its own iwi and other consultative and reporting processes and to recommend such processes for adoption by the Board and staff of Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga when dealing with matters of interest to Māori • make recommendations to Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga on applications referred by Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga under section 47(1)(b) that relate to sites of interest to Māori • consider and...
...Institute argues that the heading of its submission is not decisive and that the contents of the submission must also be taken into account. I accept that as a general proposition a submission should be read as a whole to properly ascertain its subject matter. In my view, when the submission is read as a whole (including its heading and contents), its subject matter could not be clearer. The header contains the following relevant information: • It says that it is a submission on &...
...DECISION OF TRIBUNAL STRIKING OUT STATEMENT OF CLAIM The application [1] This is an application by the defendant that these proceedings be summarily dismissed ahead of trial on the grounds that the proceedings are clearly untenable as a matter of law. [2] In Mackrell v Universal College of Learning High Court Palmerston North CIV2005- 485-802, 17 August 2005 at [48] Wild J held that the Tribunal has a wide discretionary power to strike out or dismiss a proceeding brought before...
...LIMITED) (IN LIQUIDATION) v A LABOUR INSPECTOR, MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 35 [30 March 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 35 EMPC 331/2016 EMPC 12/2017 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN NEELAM AHUJA, CHIRAG AHUJA AND RHYTHM AHUJA (RE KHOOBSURAT LIMITED) (IN LIQUIDATION) Plaintiffs AND NAARI COLLECTION LIMITED...
...set for your trust. 2. You should read through each clause carefully and alter, amend or delete where appropriate to suit your circumstances. 3. Please note that this example is intended to provide you with general information only. The Ministry of Justice makes no warranty, express or implied, nor assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, correctness, completeness or use of any information contained herein. 4. Any final terms of trust are subject to confirmation by the...
INDEPENDENT PROSPERITY LIMITED v QISHAN HUANG [2020] NZEmpC 94 [1 July 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2020] NZEmpC 94 EMPC 267/2019 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN INDEPENDENT PROSPERITY LIMITED Plaintiff AND QISHAN HUANG Defendant...
...involvement with Mr SM since the termination of the retainer around November 2011; and (c) Mr SM had not raised concerns that Mr NL was conflicted when representing the party who had commenced the DVA proceedings against Mr SM; and (d) the DVA matters on which he had been instructed, were irrelevant to any work undertaken by him for Mr SM in the past. [12] The Standards Committee identified what it described as the key issue for its investigation as being a consideration as to w...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 19 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act BETWEEN BRENT FALVEY (ENV-2016-CHC-034) Appellant AND CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J E Borthwick Hearing: In Chambers at Christchurch Date of Decision : 19 February 2018 Date of Issue: 19 February 2018 COSTS DECISION A: There is no order as to cos...