Search Results

1. IQ Ltd & Ors v ND Ltd [2023] NZDT 638 (11 October 2023) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...more members over separate SUIP rates charged by ND Ltd. Both claims were set down to be heard together and the jurisdiction issues raised by ND Ltd to be dealt with at the outset. 3. ND Ltd has raised several objections to jurisdiction: Subject matter; prior determination by High Court Arbitrator; Owners’ status as representative; monetary claim limit, arbitration clause and that the Tribunal does not have authority to make declarations. 4. At the first hearing on 15 June 2023,...

2. [2019] NZEmpC 9 Prasad v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 351 KB]

   KAMLESH PRASAD v LIUTOFAGA TULAI [2019] NZEmpC 9 [8 February 2019] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2019] NZEmpC 9 EMPC 253/2015 IN THE MATTER OF an application for access to Court documents on behalf of Aviation Workers United Inc AND IN THE MATTER of an application for a declaration under s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 BETWEEN KAMLESH PRASAD First...

3. [2013] NZEmpC 143 Q v W [pdf, 50 KB]

   Q v W NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 143[29 July 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 143 ARC 47/04 ARC 70/08 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of proceedings removed BETWEEN Q Plaintiff AND W Defendant Hearing: 29 July 2013 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: Q, plaintiff David France, counsel for defendant Judgm...

4. R. Singh v Kumar [2016] NZIACDT 47 (6 September 2016) [pdf, 114 KB]

   BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2016] NZIACDT 47 Reference No: IACDT 001/15 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar BETWEEN Raminderpal Singh Complainant AND Mayank Kumar Adviser DECISION (SANCTIONS) REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Ms A Skadiang...

5. [2022] NZEmpC 155 Pilgrim v Attorney-General [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYEMNT, LABOUR INSPECTORATE [2022] NZEmpC 155 [26 August 2022] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2022] NZEmpC 155 EMPC 85/2022 IN THE MATTER OF a declaration under s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 AND IN THE MATTER of an application for in-Court media coverage BETWEEN SERENITY PILGRIM, ANNA COURAGE, ROSE STANDTRUE, CRYSTAL LOYAL, PEARL VALOR A...

6. [2022] NZEmpC 154 Pilgrim v Attorney-General [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT, LABOUR INSPECTORATE [2022] NZEmpC 154 [25 August 2022] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2022] NZEmpC 154 EMPC 85/2022 IN THE MATTER OF a declaration under s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 AND IN THE MATTER OF an application to access Court documents BETWEEN SERENITY PILGRIM, ANNA COURAGE, ROSE STANDTRUE, CRYSTAL LOYAL, PEARL VALOR AND...

7. FT v NSC LCRO 260 / 2010 (21 October 2011) [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...basis by [FT] was capable of meeting, and (if proven) sufficient to meet a threshold test of misconduct, as defined by section 7(1)(b)(ii) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act”, and pursuant to section 152(2)(a) of the Act determined that the matter be considered by the New Zealand Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal. [9] FT has applied for a review of that decision. [10] In submissions filed by FT prior to the hearing, he stated that he had but one submission, namely...

8. [2010] NZEmpC 108 MacBeth v Cookie Time Limited [pdf, 22 KB]

   ...guilty of inordinate delay, that such delay is inexcusable, and that it has seriously prejudiced the defendant. Although these considerations are not necessarily exclusive, and at the end one must always stand back and have regard to the interests of justice, in this country, ever since New Zealand Industrial Gases Ltd v Andersons Ltd [1970] NZLR 58 it has been accepted that if the application is to be successful, the applicant must commence by proving the three factors listed. [9] The...

9. IHC NZ v Ministry of Education (Non-Party Access) [2013] NZHRRT 2 [pdf, 72 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2013] NZHRRT 2 Reference No. HRRT 024/2012 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY A NON-PARTY FOR ACCESS TO THE TRIBUNAL FILE BETWEEN IHC NEW ZEALAND PLAINTIFF AND MINISTRY OF EDUCATION FIRST DEFENDANT AND SECRETARY FOR EDUCATION SECOND DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Dr SJ Hickey, Member Mr RK Musuku, Member REPRESENTATION:...

10. 6.3 Searches and search rules

    ...objection.  The registrar will organise service of the informal application on the relevant parties.  Any person who wishes to object must give written notice of that objection to the Registrar within the required time. The judge (or the registrar in some matters) will make the decision on the search application. The judge or the registrar may grant the application, request further information or pass to counsel for comment before a final decision is made. Under rule 12 of the rules, in decid...

    Located in:

    1. About >
    2. News & media >
    3. Media centre >
    4. Media information >
    5. Media guide for reporting the courts and tribunals: Edition 4.1 >
    6. 6.0 Access to court information